mercoledì 29 dicembre 2010

148 states call for transparency over depleted uranium use in UN vote

148 states call for transparency over depleted uranium use in UN vote

148 states have supported a United Nations General Assembly resolution calling on state users of depleted uranium weapons to reveal where the weapons have been fired when asked to do so by affected countries.
8 December 2010 - ICBUW

The resolution was passed by a huge majority, with just four countries opposing the text. As with previous UN resolutions in 2007 and 2008, the UK, US, Israel and France voted against. The number of abstentions was down on previous years after Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Greece, Luxembourg and Slovenia voted in favour. Nevertheless, abstentions were still registered by Australia, Canada, Denmark and Sweden amongst others. The Russian Federation also abstained, while China declined to vote.

UN logo The resolution was triggered by growing concern over the US’s failure to release information on the whereabouts of at least 400,000kgs depleted uranium munitions used in Iraq. Question marks also remain over whether the weapons have been used in Afghanistan, Somalia and Chechnya. Research by ICBUW has shown that the rapid release of targeting data after conflicts is crucial in reducing avoidable civilian exposures; recommendations that national authorities monitor soil and water contamination and, where necessary, decontaminate sites, are also reliant on this data.

The UK, US and France maintain that it is up to the users of the weapons to release this data at a time and in a manner of their own choosing. While the UK has shared information on their use of the weapons in Iraq in 2003 with UN agencies, the US has made no effort to do so. It is now 19 years since the first major use of depleted uranium in Iraq.

In a joint statement explaining their position during the first round of voting at the First Committee, the UK, US and France wrote: “[Operative paragraph 6] requests that states that have used depleted uranium in armed conflict to provide information about its use. We have serious doubts on the relevance of such a request, according to IHL [International Humanitarian Law]. We consider that it is up to each state to provide data at such a time and in such a manner as it deems appropriate.

The attempt by these countries to try and conflate the resolution with IHL has been challenged by legal specialists, who pointed out that it is not a question of whether it is appropriate under IHL but rather whether the request in itself is reasonable. It is clear that 148 states felt that it was.

Contaminated hotpot, Hadzici, Bosnia
Gamma radiation at 40x background from decay products from a 30mm depleted uranium round under tarmac 15 years after it was fired, Hadzici, BiH.

Reacting to the vote, an ICBUW spokesperson said: “It is abundantly clear that even the most conservative mitigation measures are made much more difficult by the failure of states to promptly identify where the weapons have been used.

"The US, UK and France’s ongoing apparent policy of non or limited disclosure is outrageous and at odds with their legal obligations to protect civilians and the environment during and after conflict.

"The feebleness of their attempted justification for their position makes clear that they have few concerns over the long-term impact of these munitions on civilians, and are instead solely interested in protecting their toxic and outdated weapons. This is the strongest level of support for a resolution on this issue yet and we believe it reflects a growing impatience with the users of these weapons.”

On learning of the results, UK campaigners reacted angrily, accusing the UK government of hypocrisy and of ignoring the wishes of its own parliament. In the run up to the vote, 90 Members of Parliament had signed a motion calling on the government to support the resolution, while representatives from all the main UK parties had written to the press to highlight the text.

A spokesperson for the UK Uranium Weapons Network said: “The UK’s decision to vote against the resolution is extremely disappointing. Sites contaminated by land mines, cluster munitions or depleted uranium all represent a post-conflict hazard to civilians.

"All these sites require remedial work and, as a vast majority of states recognise, including those states that have had to endure the impact of these weapons, this work is impossible without full transparency over where the weapons have been used.”

As with previous years, the resolution was submitted by Indonesia on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. In addition to the general call for transparency, it also recognised the importance of implementing recommendations by UN agencies to help mitigate the hazards from depleted uranium. Discussion over the long-term impact of these weapons is ongoing but the World Health Organisation and International Atomic Energy Agency both call for sites to be marked, and where necessary decontaminated. The United Nations Environment Programme has called for a precautionary approach to the use of the weapons due to ongoing uncertainties about the environmental behaviour of uranium contamination.

Resolutions passed in 2007 and 2008 accepted the potential risk from depleted uranium weapons and called for more focused research on affected states. This research has been hindered the lack of transparency from users.

The full list of abstainers is as follows: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Micronesia, Palau, Poland, Portugal, Rep of Korea, Rep of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Sao Tome and Principe, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, TFYR Macedonia, Turkey and Ukraine. A full voting record can be downloaded below:

Attachments

martedì 28 dicembre 2010

Rich White Men Are Most Likely to Survive Nuclear Blast

AlterNet / By Ira Chernus

Government Report: Rich White Men Are Most Likely to Survive Nuclear Blast
That’s just one of the startling revelations found in 'Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation,' a 130-page report prepared with your tax dollars.
AlterNet, December 27, 2010 |


Good news! You’ve got a pretty good chance of surviving a terrorist’s nuclear blast in your city -- especially if you’re a rich white man. Women, ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic classes are more likely to be “stricken by psychiatric disorders,” and once they start going crazy they’re less likely to survive.

That’s just one of the startling revelations in the new second edition of “Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation,” a 130-page report produced, thanks to your tax dollars, by the Obama administration's National Security Staff Interagency Policy Coordination Subcommittee for Preparedness and Response to Radiological and Nuclear Threats. (I’m not making this up, honest.)

And there’s more good news. Even if you are not rich, white and male, a nuke detonated in a major U.S. city is “is more survivable than most people think.” That’s what “an official deeply involved in the planning” told the New York Times’ William Broad, that intrepid reporter of all things nuclear, who broke the story.

If you are a fan of Kafka or Alice in Wonderland, you might want to read the whole report for yourself (though first you’ll have to memorize the 50-plus acronyms it uses). For the rest of you, here are just a few of the more surreal tidbits:

If a terrorist detonates a nuclear weapon in your city, you’ll have “a few seconds” after seeing the flash “to take limited protective measures.” But “five seconds … is enough time for a person with the right information to seek basic shelter (e.g., duck and cover),” the authors assure us, although they admit that when the government promoted “duck and cover” during the Cold War era it left the public “skeptical of preparedness messages.” Are you skeptical yet?

You can get “the right information” from this report, stuff you might not have figured out on your own, like “Survivors should not seek shelter in buildings that are on fire.”

And there will be plenty of buildings on fire, especially in the MD (Moderate Damage) zone, estimated to be a half-mile to a mile from the blast point. (The SD [Severe Damage] zone, within a half-mile of ground zero, will be obliterated, so it gets little attention in this manual for emergency responders.) In the MD “fires fed by broken gas lines, ruptured fuel tanks, and other sources will be prevalent … a major threat to survivors” and to responders rushing to the rescue.

Nevertheless, “search and rescue missions should be practicable in the MD zone,” and “many casualties will survive.” The MD will be “the focus of early life-saving operations,” since that’s where survivors “will benefit most from urgent medical care.”

Responders apparently won’t be deterred by the fires, nor by the “elevated radiation levels, unstable buildings and other structures, downed power lines, ruptured gas lines, hazardous (perhaps airborne) chemicals, sharp metal objects, broken glass … substantial rubble and crashed and overturned vehicles in streets.”

“Passage of rescue vehicles [will be] difficult or impossible” in the MD. “It will take a concerted effort to get responder resources to keep pushing forward.” Their path will have to be cleared by “heavy equipment and debris removal capabilities.” Oh, and “radiation levels in the MD zone may be very high.” All in all, “responder units within one or two miles from ground zero may be compromised or completely nonfunctional” while thousands lie dying.

The responders will be moving in from the LD (Low Damage) zone, where the streets will be filled with broken glass, but anyone wounded by the flying glass will be ignored as long as they are “ambulatory.” Of course responders will face that pesky little problem of EMP (electromagnetic pulse): “Communications equipment (cell towers, etc.) electronics destroyed or disrupted, computer equipment electrical components destroyed, control systems electrical components destroyed, water and electrical system control components destroyed or disrupted, and other electronic devices damage.” Up to four miles from ground zero, “it may be days before communications capabilities are reestablished. Within this area, all communications capabilities will be destroyed or severely hindered.”

Yet the report is filled with detailed plans for “search and rescue missions” and “urgent medical care” somehow being carried out in the MD, all supposedly coordinated with impressive precision by “incident commanders,” because “delays in issuing and implementing recommendations (or orders) could result in a large number of unnecessary fatalities.” How they’ll get all those orders issued with no functioning communication system remains unexplained.

As the Citizen Corps Web site points out, “given the daytime population density of a large modern city, the number that would be hurt by prompt effects of the blast or threatened by fallout particles could be in the hundreds of thousands.” And it’s obvious that in the real world -- as opposed to the report’s fantasy world -- the vast majority would get no medical care and thus would die.

But wait. There is still more good news: “Response capabilities more than five miles away from ground zero are likely to be only nominally affected by blast and EMP and should be able to mobilize and respond, provided they are not within the path of dangerous fallout levels.” And the DF (Dangerous Fallout) zone will extend only a mere “10 - 20 miles” (though there will be a “larger contaminated area beyond the DF zone” too). What’s more, all the dangerous fallout will come down “within about 24 hours.” So the millions in that zone will be pretty safe if they quickly get inside the closest “robust shelter” and stay there for more than a day. (That includes survivors in the MD, apparently -- if they can find any robust buildings that aren’t burning.)

Of course “effective decontamination” is required before entering a shelter. What’s “effective”? At one point, the report says that “simply brushing off outer garments will be sufficient to protect oneself and others.” But at other points the advice is quite different: “Remove clothes and shower … place your clothing in a plastic bag and seal or tie the bag … put on clean clothing, if available.”

No clean clothes (and probably no showers) in that handy shelter building? Don’t worry. All those naked folks can “assume that the dominant behavioral response will likely be … pro-social, altruistic behaviors.” Why, it might even be fun.

Sooner or later, “effective decontamination methods that are easiest to implement” will begin: vacuuming, fire hosing, steam cleaning, and the like. If that doesn’t work, the authorities will proceed to “sandblasting” and “road resurfacing.” As they say in Australia, no worries, mate.

To be fair, the report does admit there are some big problems to solve: “People will not be able to discern which shelters are more adequate than others.” Plus there’s “the natural instinct to run from danger” rather than duck into the nearest building. The answer is advance education, now: “Response planners should implement public messaging prior to the disaster.”

One good way to get the word out is to target “grade school students who can bring the information home … in the form of school calendars and book bags labeled with safety tips.” And parents should be informed about schools’ plans to keep their kids “sheltered-in-place” -- even though (in bold letters) “procedures that separate children from parents will be unsuccessful.”

By the way, all this planning assumes only a 10-kiloton explosion, which puts “several hundred thousand people at risk of death” if they don’t get the word about shelter within a few minutes. Of course 10K is a mere firecracker in terms of today’s nuclear arsenals. But the study assumes terrorists won’t be able to manage anything bigger.

Why make such an assumption? I found a clue in my research on President Eisenhower's approach to nuclear danger. Ike was determined that in case of a nuclear attack the U.S. should be prepared for “digging ourselves out of ashes, starting again,” and winning a nuclear war. “If we assumed too much damage,” he told subordinates, “there would be little point in planning.” So he directed civil defense planners to keep their “assumptions as to the extent of damage within limits which provide a basis for feasible planning,” rather than dealing with what would really happen. Maybe the same unreality prevails in the Obama administration?

Today’s planners certainly sound a lot like Eisenhower, who wanted to teach Americans to be “resolute survivors… a concerted national effort at patriotic renewal and spiritual advance.” The big problem, in his view, was “how you get people to face such a possibility without getting hysterical.”

In 2010, the head of FEMA told the Times’ William Broad: “We have to get past the mental block that says it’s too terrible to think about. … We have to be ready to deal with it.” The director for preparedness policy at the National Security Council declared that the administration wants “to enhance national resilience --- to withstand disruption, adapt to change and rapidly recover.”

Broad seems eager to promote the upbeat message: “The big surprise was how taking shelter for as little as several hours made a huge difference in survival rates. ‘This has been a game changer,' Brooke Buddemeier, a Livermore health physicist, told a Los Angeles conference.” If everyone living a mile or more from ground zero of an attack took shelter “at the core of a big office building or in an underground garage, ‘We’d have no significant exposures,’ Mr. Buddemeier told the conference, and thus virtually no casualties from fallout.”

Of course they’d actually have to stay sheltered for at least 24 hours and maybe “several days,” according to the report -- without food, many bleeding from the flying glass, some blinded from seeing the flash. Then there would be all those women, ethnic minorities, and lower socioeconomic folks who would be going crazy. Oh, and did I mention that “many people will be relocated for months to years at great distances downwind?” The report mentions it only very incidentally. No worries, mate.

Reading this report reminded me of my days doing research in the Eisenhower Library, trying to master the art of laughing and crying at the same time. The tragedy of Eisenhower was that, as he created an image of a president pursuing peace, he blocked possibilities for disarmament and Cold War reconciliation at every turn. Instead he expanded the nuclearized military-industrial complex (and then on his last day in office fooled history into thinking he opposed it) while making fantasy plans for surviving and winning a nuclear war.

Now the Obama administration wants us to learn to accept the prospect of a major American city destroyed. Its report never even mentions the possibility of averting disaster by changing the U.S. policies that enrage people, whether abroad or at home. Maybe the administration has another interagency task force working on that problem.

But I doubt it. They would have to treat those who dream of using nukes as monstrous people who may nonetheless have rational grievances worth paying attention to. Remember that our own government has reams of plans to use nukes in the worst-case scenario if its grievances are ignored. But the fundamental principle of U.S. foreign policy since World War II has been to divide all humanity into two groups: people like us, the good guys, who are by definition rational even when planning to use, or actually using, nuclear weapons; and the bad guys, the irrational evildoers bent on wreaking destruction for the sake of destruction. In that scenario, there’s no point in even thinking about the bad guys’ motivating grievances, much less trying to address them constructively.

No administration can even hint at challenging that principle and hope to get its leader re-elected. Politically it’s so much safer just to spread the good news that a nuke in your city is more survivable than you thought -- especially if you’re a rich white man.
Ira Chernus is professor of religious studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder and author of “The Real Eisenhower. Read more of his writing on his blog: http://chernus.wordpress.com.

Complotti CIA, rivelazioni a prova di Bomba

Complotti CIA, rivelazioni a prova di Bomba
di Giulietto Chiesa - 27/12/2010

Fonte: megachip

intelligennucl

Avviso ai lettori di questa nota. Vorremmo inaugurare una nuova serie di commenti e analisi, dedicata interamente ai “negazionisti del complotto”. Cioè a quei signori che, per incultura politica totale, ovvero per introiettata, supina acquiescenza alle fonti ufficiali (il riferimento è, in questo caso, ai giornalisti mancati) si affannano, ogni volta che qualcuno cerca una spiegazione ai fatti che occorrono nella vita reale, ad accusarlo di “complottismo”.

Categorie, le sopra elencate, assai numerose, oltre che oltremodo dannose per la convivenza umana. Salvo che per un aspetto: che allietano la nostra esistenza con inaspettate capriole, gag, involontaria esibizione di comica insipienza, della qual cosa siamo loro moderatamente grati.

E veniamo al dunque. Il giornale più complottista del mondo – così ci pare di poterlo definire dopo la rivelazione dei nove banchieri nove che si riuniscono una volta al mese a South Manhattan, nei pressi di Wall Street, per decidere i destini, finanziari e non, del pianeta – (s’intende il New York Times), appena messo piede nella Grande Mela, mi gratifica di un altro episodio principe di complottismo al quadrato. Con un titolo in prima pagina che è tutto un programma, il New York Times ci aiutava a trascorrere in pace il Natale e il Capodanno: «I segreti della CIA potrebbero affacciarsi in un procedimento penale svizzero».

Ohibò, dico io. Sarà mica un altro episodio della saga di Wikileaks?

No, state tranquilli. Wikileaks non c’entra. C’entra un magistrato svizzero, nome Andreas Müller, Carneade che vuol mettersi nei guai, che ha scoperto, dopo due anni d’indagini, i seguenti, succulenti retroscena (leggi complotti).

Retroscena uno: c’era un gruppetto di operatori economici, composto da padre, e due figli, tali Friedrich Tiller (padre) e Urs e Marco (figli), che aiutarono, per anni, l’architetto della bomba nucleare pakistana, A.Q.Khan, a smerciare i suoi segreti verso la Corea del Nord, verso l’Iran, verso la Libia, insomma impiegati per conto della nota sequela di “stati canaglia” come ebbe a definirli, a suo tempo, George Bush Junior.

Impiegati si fa per dire, perchè presero decine, probabilmente centinaia di milioni di dollari per questi servigi.

Va bene, direte, ma che c’entra la CIA? Ecco il retroscena due. I Tiller lavoravano anche per la CIA. E, s’intende, prendevano decine di milioni anche per questo secondo servigio. Ma come? – direbbero Pier Luigi Battista, o Ferruccio Bello, vuoi forse affermare che era la CIA che controllava lo smercio di tecnologie nucleari? Risposta difficile a darsi. Forse che sì, forse che anche.

Fatto sta che la CIA pare abbia fatto fuoco e fiamme per impedire che l’inchiesta del signor Andreas Mueller andasse in porto. Scrive il New York Times che “l’Amministrazione Bush ha fatto pressioni straordinarie per proteggere i Tiller da ogni investigazione, arrivando al punto di persuadere le autorità svzzere a distruggere equipaggiamenti e informazioni che erano state scoperte nei loro computers”.

In effetti pare che ci siano riusciti solo in parte, ma quanto basta per fare sbottare il detto Mueller:

il governo svizzero – ha detto il giovedì prima di Natale, illustrando ai giornalisti un rapporto di 174 pagine – “ha interferito massicciamente sul corso della giustizia, distruggendo quasi tutte le prove”.

Così abbiamo conferma di un piccolo complotto dentro un grande complotto: il governo svizzero è sovrano, su certe questioni, come Gianni Riotta è un frate francescano, o Augusto Minzolini un agente di viaggi nel Mar dei Caraibi.

E veniamo al retroscena principale (come lo chiameremo se non complotto, visto che avveniva, ma fuori da ogni legge e, soprattutto, fuori da ogni pubblicità?): com’è che la CIA usava i Tiller?

Lasciava che passassero i disegni delle bombe a chi li aveva commissionati, ma ogni tanto – senti senti l’astuzia ! – infilavano in quei disegni, o in quelle apparecchiature, dei “difetti”, o dei bugs, che avrebbero potuto sia provocare disastri in corso di fabbricazione, sia fornire informazioni circa la prosecuzione dei “lavori” di costruzione delle bombe. Naturalmente, in questo modo, la CIA poteva ostacolare il procedimento. Ma resta il fatto che la CIA sapeva tutto in anticipo di quanto stava avvenendo. A quanto risulta al magistrato svizzero, in molti casi disegni e documentazione essenziale sono stati lasciati “passare” con il beneplacito del servizio segreto americano. Il che spiega perfettamente, adesso, perchè gli Stati Uniti non vogliono che la verità venga a galla, e proteggono i Tiller.

Questo è il punto. Se si scoprisse la verità, ogni volta che si alza l’allarme atomico, sia esso in Nord Corea, sia in Iran, potremmo subito ringraziare gli Stati Uniti d’America per il cospicuo contributo da essi dato alle bombe atomiche dei paesi canaglia.

Ma c’è un altro punto da far emergere, ad uso e consumo dei “negazionisti dei complotti”. Questa storia ci dice, a chiare lettere, che non c’è azione eversiva, gruppo terroristico, atto terroristico vero e proprio, operazione di diversione, complotto, crisi di governo, che non sia monitorato accuratamente dai servizi segreti americani.

Onnipotenti? Niente affatto, perchè non si può essere contemporaneamente onnipotenti e stupidi. Ma molto presenti, e molto ricchi, questo sì, lo si può affermare. Quindi, quando scoppiano le bombe, siano esse atomiche o al plastico, chiedetevi sempre, voi che non siete “negazionisti del complotto”, quanto di ciò che sarebbe accaduto probabilmente sapevano in anticipo i servizi segreti americani. Naturalmente tutto questo non c’entra nulla con l’11 settembre del 2001.

domenica 28 novembre 2010

Il «caso uranio»: fra le cure spunta Di Bella

GAZZETTA DI MODENA - Prima Pagina
martedì 14 maggio 2002, S. Mattia, Apostolo
Ricerca consiglia i retinoidi
Il «caso uranio»: fra le cure spunta Di Bella
di Vincenzo Brancatisano

"Quello dell'uranio impoverito è un problema più politico che scientifico". Le rivelazioni della Gazzetta (articolo di Stefano Bellentani) circa lo studio sulla contaminazione dei soldati italiani da uranio usato nei Balcani, studio affidato all'equipe del professor Umberto Torelli della Divisione di Ematologia del nostro Policlinico, hanno indotto la reazione dell'Istituto Europeo di Ricerca e Sviluppo nel Sociale di Milano. Il ricercatore dell'Ierss, Marco Saba, sostiene che "il problema della contaminazione da uranio impoverito, che poi si è rivelato contaminato da Plutonio ed altri metalli pesanti poiché fu fabbricato negli Usa mischiando al U-238 scarti di centrali nucleari, è un problema squisitamente politico più che scientifico, come ha già sottolineato il professor Asaf Durakovic, ex responsabile medico del Pentagono per la questione dell'uranio impoverito. Questo professore, costretto a lasciare il lavoro negli Usa per pressioni politiche, esercita ora come specialista di medicina nucleare all'Ospedale e Centro Ricerca "King Faisal" a Riad in Arabia Saudita. L'uranio impoverito fu usato e viene usato ancora nella realizzazione delle ogive dei proiettili per la sua micidiale capacità di penetrazione, ma trova utilizzo in altre forme, quale ad esempio quello del contrappeso negli aerei di linea. C'è chi sospetta, in merito, che questi usi siano preordinati alla necessità di smaltimento di materiale radioattivo fuoriuscito dalle centrali nucleari. La questione è nota da molti anni ma solo da poco tempo ha ottenuto la giusta attenzione, a causa dell'incredibile numero di malattie neoplastiche associate in qualche modo con l'uso dell'uranio nelle zone di guerra. L'anno scorso fu costituita una commisione presieduta dall'ematologo romano Mandelli, che in pochi giorni decretò l'ininfluenza dell'uranio nella sospetta produzione delle patologie tumorali tra i soldati, ma quella decisione suscitò polemiche non solo tra gli ufficiali e le famiglie delle vittime. Marco Saba fu tra i primi a denunciare il pericolo connesso all'uso dell'uranio. Ora scende in campo per dire che nelle more degli studi, che si preannunciano anche interessanti, occorre fare qualcosa per disintossicare le migliaia di potenziali vittime, si pensi solo all'Iraq. Tra le vittime inconsapevoli, forse, anche soldati e volontari italiani che furono in missione nei posti dove fu massiccio l'uso dell'uranio.

Spiega Saba: "Mentre gli specialisti si perdono in disquisizioni per cercare di attribuire le patologie associabili all'inquinamento radioattivo alle più svariate cause (vaccini, meteoriti extragalattiche, mucche pazze e altro), non si pensa altrettanto a provvedere a curare per quanto possibile gli effetti di questa contaminazione". Saba ricorda che esistono prodotti in commercio, i retinoidi, che in qualche modo si ricollegano a Modena, visto che sono i farmaci usati dal professor Luigi Di Bella nella sua discussa terapia anticancro. "Dalla nostra ricerca abbiamo trovato che la somministrazione della soluzione ai retinoidi (vitamina A, Betacarotene sciolti in vitamina E, ndr., farmaco di riferimento della Mdb, ndr.) associata all'Alginato di Sodio, procura da un lato il rinforzamento del sistema immunitario e dall'altro riduce l'emivita biologica dei radionucleidi ingeriti. E proprio da questa ricerca nasce il progetto di realizzare a Bassora in Iraq un'industria farmaceutica con la partecipazione di Snam-Progetti ed il patrocinio dell'Irss della Fondazione Oasi. Bene comunque che qualcosa si muova in Italia almeno per sensibilizzare l'opinione pubblica".

giovedì 11 novembre 2010

Leaked US files show how uranium weapons have caused problems

Leaked US files show how uranium weapons have caused problems for EOD teams

The Iraqi War Logs, recently released on the Wikileaks website, show that the presence in Iraq of munitions containing DU causes difficulties for US troops.
2 November 2010 - ICBUW

Wikileaks Logo Documents show that uranium weapons are complicating explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) efforts by US troops, and suspected DU is cited in several false alarms. There is also a case of an hoax improvised explosive device (IED) being constructed with a round containing DU, and of trucks carrying radioactive scrap being intercepted near the border with Turkey. As Iraq did not possess uranium weapons prior to 2003, it must be assumed that for all the incidents involving uranium weapons, these weapons were brought into the country by either US or UK forces.

The released information is comprised of over 390,000 US military field reports from 2004 to 2009, and follows the release of similar documents related to the war in Afghanistan. ICBUW has investigated both sets of documents for evidence of the use of uranium weapons. However each report covers a single incident which might be of interest to military superiors, and only contains details which might be noteworthy for such an audience. Information such as the type of ammunition fired is generally not included.

After the release of the Afghanistan documents, there were claims that information could have endangered US informants, however the pentagon has been forced to concede that there is no evidence that this has actually occurred. However, in response to this criticism Wikileaks have heavily redacted information from the Iraqi documents. Unfortunately, the way this has been done is rather erratic, and unobjectionable information, such as the calibre of rounds, has also been removed.

However, information that can be gleaned from the Iraqi documents show the effect that the presence of uranium weapons has had on coalition operations. In several instances, the work of EOD teams has been complicated by the suspected presence of DU. In some cases this appears to have been abandoned or unexploded uranium weapons left by coalition forces.

However, other reports show the alarm that suspected DU can cause US troops. At an incident between Ramadi and Fallujah in 2005, it was suspected that a rocket fired at US troops may have contained DU, and the area was cleared (see below for the report). In 2006, soldiers who were disarming an IED in a market north of Baghdad found a substance they suspected to be DU, and had to call for a more experienced EOD team – the substance was found to be home made explosive.

Another report suggests that insurgents may be using concerns about DU to their advantage. A 2008 incident involved a fake IED incorporating a uranium weapons round north of Tikrit. The round was passed on to an EOD team, but analysis in the report suggests that purpose of the hoax device may have been to lure an EOD team to the area. The team, who would be considered a high value target by insurgents because of their skills, would then be targeted by a real device.

An incident in 2004 highlights another well known concern about the use of uranium weapons – that contaminated metal from targeted vehicles may find its way into the commercial scrap trade. Several trucks that were apparently crossing into Turkey had high levels of radioactivity. Although the report does not indicate what radioactive materials were on the trucks, several scrap yards were investigated as the possible source. A copy of this report is detailed below.

Taken together, these incidents clearly show that the use of uranium weapons by the US and UK were not just a matter of concern for civilians and the Iraqi authorities, but have presented also difficulties for their own side. It also seems clear that, despite their attempts to imply that there is no health risk from DU, this propaganda is not even believed by their own troops on the ground.

Iraqi War Logs - 2005-309-012351-0399
IDF ATTK ON -___ AR IVO : ___ INJ/DAMAGE
2005-11-04 11:42:00


AT 1742C, -___ REPORTS THAT (___) ROUND OF IDF IMPACTED IVO GRID ( ___). THE IMPACT LOCATION WAS OBSERVED BY ECP-___, OP-___ AND OP-___. ROUGH RIDERS ___ WHERE DISPATCHED TO THE AREA TO CONDUCT A SEARCH. PANTHER FIRE SUPPORT ELEMENT (___) FROM CAMP ___ REPORTED THAT AN OP FROM ___ ENGINEERS IVO ( ___) WITNESSED A LAUNCH IVO ( ___), AT AN ___ OF ___ DEG. PANTHER ALSO REPORTED THAT THIS COULD BE A ___ ROCKET WITH DEPLETED URANIUM ___. WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL AND DARKNESS, THE ROUGH RIDERS WHERE PULLED BACK OUTSIDE THE AREA. THE ROUGH RIDERS ___ SEARCH FOR THE POI IN THE MORNING. AFTER CONTACTING CAPTAIN ___ AT ___ ENGINEERS, THIS POI WAS DISCUSSED AS ONE PREVIOUSLY USED; HOWEVER, NO IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPECIFIC TYPE OF ROCKET COULD BE DETERMINED FOR THIS ATTACK. THE SITUATION ___ DEVELOP VIA INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE /___ INFANTRY AND THE ___ ENGINEERS. COUNTER BATTERY RADAR DID NOT ACQUIRE THIS IDF AND PANTHER ___ DID NOT HAVE A COUNTER BATTERY FIRE MISSION AT THE TIME OF IMPACT. UPDATE TO FOLLOW.

UPDATE # - ___ ENGINEERS HAS REVISED THE POO GRID AS ( ___). ALSO, A WHITE ___ TRUCK WITH RAILS WAS SPOTTED IN THE AREA AT THE TIME OF LAUNCH. THIS TYPE OF VEHICLE HAD BEEN OBSERVED IN THE PAST, VIA UAV, AS A ROCKET LAUNCH PLATFORM.

UPDATE # , --___ QRF ELEMENT SWEPT POSSIBLE IMPACT AREA WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS.

AT 1742C, -___ REPORTS THAT (___) ROUND OF IDF IMPACTED IVO GRID ( ___). THE IMPACT LOCATION WAS OBSERVED BY ECP-___, OP-___ AND OP-___. ROUGH RIDERS ___ WHERE DISPATCHED TO THE AREA TO CONDUCT A SEARCH. PANTHER FIRE SUPPORT ELEMENT (___) FROM CAMP ___ REPORTED THAT AN OP FROM ___ ENGINEERS IVO ( ___) WITNESSED A LAUNCH IVO ( ___), AT AN ___ OF ___ DEG. PANTHER ALSO REPORTED THAT THIS COULD BE A ___ ROCKET WITH DEPLETED URANIUM ___. WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL AND DARKNESS, THE ROUGH RIDERS WHERE PULLED BACK OUTSIDE THE AREA. THE ROUGH RIDERS ___ SEARCH FOR THE POI IN THE MORNING. AFTER CONTACTING CAPTAIN ___ AT ___ ENGINEERS, THIS POI WAS DISCUSSED AS ONE PREVIOUSLY USED; HOWEVER, NO IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPECIFIC TYPE OF ROCKET COULD BE DETERMINED FOR THIS ATTACK. THE SITUATION ___ DEVELOP VIA INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE /___ INFANTRY AND THE ___ ENGINEERS. COUNTER BATTERY RADAR DID NOT ACQUIRE THIS IDF AND PANTHER ___ DID NOT HAVE A COUNTER BATTERY FIRE MISSION AT THE TIME OF IMPACT. UPDATE TO FOLLOW.

UPDATE # - ___ ENGINEERS HAS REVISED THE POO GRID AS ( ___). ALSO, A WHITE ___ TRUCK WITH RAILS WAS SPOTTED IN THE AREA AT THE TIME OF LAUNCH. THIS TYPE OF VEHICLE HAD BEEN OBSERVED IN THE PAST, VIA UAV, AS A ROCKET LAUNCH PLATFORM.

UPDATE # , --___ QRF ELEMENT SWEPT POSSIBLE IMPACT AREA WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS.

Iraqi War Logs - 01LNO-91939054
___ SURVEY AT ___ GATE
2004-01-26 07:00:00

TF -___ CAV (___ TRP) REPORTED THEIR ___ FOX RECON PLATOON CONDUCTED ___ SURVEY AT ___ GATE IAW CJTF-___ FRAGO ___. THE PLATOON REPORTED ___ OF ___ SCRAP METAL TRUCKS HAD HIGH LEVELS OF RADIATION (___). THE TRUCKS ARE ISOLATED AND SECURED. SURVEYED OTHER TRUCKS CROSSING INTO TURKEY AND THE SCRAP METAL YARD (___) WHERE THE SOURCES MAY HAVE ORIGINATED. ALL SURVEYS ARE NEGATIVE.TF -___ CAV (___ TRP) REPORTED THEIR ___ FOX RECON PLATOON CONDUCTED ___ SURVEY AT ___ GATE IAW CJTF-___ FRAGO ___. THE PLATOON REPORTED ___ OF ___ SCRAP METAL TRUCKS HAD HIGH LEVELS OF RADIATION (___). THE TRUCKS ARE ISOLATED AND SECURED. SURVEYED OTHER TRUCKS CROSSING INTO TURKEY AND THE SCRAP METAL YARD (___) WHERE THE SOURCES MAY HAVE ORIGINATED. ALL SURVEYS ARE NEGATIVE.
Notes:

http://wikileaks.org/iraq/diarydig
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/iraq-war-logs

Depleted uranium Motion tabled in Scottish Parliament

Depleted uranium Motion tabled in Scottish Parliament

Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) have submitted a motion calling on the UK government to abstain or vote in favour when the UN General Assembly considers the new resolution on depleted uranium weapons.
4 November 2010 - ICBUW

Bill Wilson MSP The Motion echoes the Early Day Motion (EDM) currently before the UK Parliament, which also calls on the UK to support the new UN resolution. The EDM resolution has now been signed by 69 Members of Parliament (see link at the end of this article) from all the main parties.

The Motion's sponsor, Dr Bill Wilson MSP, is a member of the Scottish Nationalist Party and former environmental scientist. He has been deeply troubled by the ongoing reports of birth defects in the Iraqi city of Fallujah.

During the first vote on the new UN resolution at the First Committee last week, the UK joined only the US, France and Israel in opposing the text as 136 states voted in favour. The General Assembly will vote on the resolution at the end of November.

In their explanation of vote at the First Committee, the UK, France and US claimed that it should be up to them to decide if and when information on the whereabouts of the munitions that they have fired is released. Research by ICBUW suggests that the rapid release of accurate data following conflicts is the single most effective means of reducing the risk from the weapons. To date, the US has failed to release information on at least 404,000kg of DU that it used in Iraq in 1991 and 2003. The UK on the other hand has shared data on their use of the weapons in Iraq in 2003, because of this it was hoped that they would support the new draft.

S3M-7332 Bill Wilson: UN Vote on Depleted Uranium
That the Parliament notes various reports of recent increases in the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers, stillbirths and birth defects in Iraq, which also suggest that these are linked to the deployment of depleted uranium weaponry; supports the recent UN resolution calling on countries using depleted uranium weapons to release quantitative and geographical data relating to the use of these weapons to the governments of affected states; notes that the UK Government did not support the resolution at an earlier stage, and expresses the hope that, when the resolution goes forward to the United Nations General Assembly for a second vote at the end of November 2010, it will at least not veto it.

A previous Motion tabled in 2009 by the Scottish Greens stated:That the Parliament acknowledges the European Parliament’s resolution on “Depleted uranium weapons and their effect on human health and the environment - towards a global ban on the use of such weapons”; recognises the serious health concerns about the use of depleted uranium weapons on both military personnel and civilians, concerns that are widely acknowledged by many including the UN General Assembly; further recognises the serious environmental hazards posed by depleted uranium such as the contamination of soil and groundwater, and strongly urges the Scottish Government to offer its moral and, where appropriate, practical support for a global ban on the use of depleted uranium weapons.

Scotland is home to one of the UK's two depleted uranium firing ranges. The site at Dundrennan has been used to fire in the region of 30 tonnes of 120mm depleted uranium tank rounds into the Solway Firth - something that has long been a matter of concern to local people and parliamentarians.

Notes:

EDM 825 UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION ON DEPLETED URANIUM
http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=41791&SESSION=905

S3M-7332 Bill Wilson: UN Vote on Depleted Uranium
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/motionsandamendments/motions.htm

venerdì 8 ottobre 2010

GI’s Brains Fried by Military Nose Candy

GI’s Brains Fried by Military Dispensed Nose Candy

Veterans Today, October 2, 2010 posted by Bob Nichols

News Alert — Jeff Rense’s rebroadcast show airs Monday at 10:00 pm Pacific Time to discuss “GI’s Brains Fried by Military Dispensed Nose Candy.” Google: “the Jeff Rense Program”

(San Francisco) – Now it is official. Researchers have shown that uranium oxide, or DU, “travels the nerves from the nose to the brain,” in the words of a University of Chicago doc and researcher.

James Blake Miller Los Angeles Times photo by Luis Sinco

James Blake Miller Los Angeles Times photo by Luis Sinco

A tiny amount (a milligram) of this radioactive poison quick marches up your smelling nerves right into your brain and keeps firing 1.2 Million bullets a day – forever. That’s a bunch.

850 Rounds a Minute

The radioactive 850 rounds a minute automatic weapon is about as big as the period at the end of this sentence, never needs reloading and never jams. It’s a perfect killing machine for brain cells and other cells. The range is about 20 cells, after that there is what the famous British physicist Dr. Chris Busby calls the “bystander effect.” He discovered it, he gets to name it.

These radioactive automatic weapons are so small they can float right through your clothes, evade your skin’s defenses and invade your body. Wherever the weapons alight inside, there is trouble as they never stop firing and there is no limit to their number. In a soldiers brain, trouble shows up in a noticeable way to others.

As for the 20 cell radius ball within Range, think of these powerful Bullets each as a 100 car, 100 mph, or 160 kmh, fully loaded freight train obliterating a small dog tied to the railroad tracks. Right, for the 20 cells that are within range – in all directions, it ain’t pretty.

To me, this means these 20 cell radius spheres in Soldiers and Vets brains turn to jelly or mush, weird diseases or cancers, or all of the above. No wonder VA Secretary and former General Eric Shinseki has noted the big increase in the VA’s contract Psychiatric services.

Olfactory Nerve to Brain, The Free Dictionary

Olfactory Nerve to Brain, The Free Dictionary

This radioactive bullet explanation for Vets unusual behaviors holds water and makes perfect sense to me. The Vets are under attack internally. Actually inside their skulls and in their brains. Worse, there’s nothing they can do about it. The huge VA system is also helpless. There is no cure and no treatment.

The VA knows it and is stonewalling. They fired the only doc who stood up to them on DU. Word travels fast among the cowed medical staffs.

So, the Vets get slapped with some fake diagnosis and sent to the shrink or told there is nothing wrong with them. No way the spineless docs are going to call it like it is. They grab their 250K and slink home, comfortable every night.

That ain’t no way to run an Army; but, it IS a way to run the world’s most lethal Armed Force right into the ground.

Major Doug Rokke, Ph.D, Ret., former Director of the Pentagon’s Depleted Uranium Project, puts it succinctly “It [DU] is killing our own troops.”

General Eric Shinseki, Head of VA

Since no less than Gen Shinseki has pointed out the huge increases in contract psychiatric services, let’s all take note of it and ask real loud “Why is this happening to Vets? They are not the enemy!” It’s way past time to take names and kick ass in DC. That means changing the President as s/he appoints the head of the DOD. Not so hard to do, really. It is simply what is required.

No wonder DU in the brain drives Vets nuts. The suffering these Vets must go through is unimaginable.

OK. Here’s the targeted science, make up your own minds. I did.

Abstract
http://tinyurl.com/ku3ctn

Uranium travels nerves from nose to brain.

Jul 31, 2009

Tournier, BB, S Frelon, E Tourlonias, L Agez, O Delissen, I Dublineau, F Paquet, and F Petitot. 2009. Role of the olfactory receptor neurons in the direct transport of inhaled uranium to the rat brain. Toxicology Letters doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.022.

Synopsis by Paul Eubig, DVM

Radioactive uranium that is inhaled by soldiers on the battlefield and by workers in factories may bypass the brain’s protective barrier by following nerves from the nose directly to the brain.

Nerves can act as a unique conduit, carrying inhaled uranium from the nose directly to the brain, finds a study with rats. Once in the brain, the uranium may affect task and decision-related types of thinking.

This study provides yet another example of how some substances can use the olfactory system – bypassing the brain’s protective blood barrier – to go directly to the brain. Titanium nanoparticles and the metals manganese, nickel, and thallium have been shown to reach the brain using the same route.

Military personnel and people who work in uranium processing plants are exposed to the weak radioactive element via wounds or by breathing. Exposure may affect brain function; cognitive skills are lowered in soldiers who carry uranium-laced shrapnel.

Uranium has various industrial and military uses. A form of uranium called depleted uranium is very dense and is used in armor-piercing ammunition and military vehicle armor.

Battlefield exposure can occur through wounds – such as with some US military personnel who were injured during the Gulf War. These exposures can be higher than with civilians who work with the element. A study of Gulf War veterans who have uranium shrapnel in their bodies showed that they perform more poorly on general brain cognitive tests of performance efficiency and accuracy.

Uranium can also be inhaled. Soldiers in vehicles hit by uranium rounds and workers in uranium-processing facilities can breathe it in.

The researchers – taking advantage of the fact that uranium can exist in different forms, or isotopes – used rats to compare how the element travels through the body if it is inhaled or injected into the blood. The animals breathed in one isotope at levels similar to those encountered on a battlefield where depleted uranium weapons are used. They were also injected with a different isotope. Researchers compared the levels of the two isotopes in different regions of the brain.

The inhaled isotope accumulated at 2 to 3 times higher levels than the injected isotope in the olfactory (smell) paths from the nose to the brain and in the frontal cortex and hypothalamus of the brain. This is concerning because the front part of the brain controls executive function, which is the broad ability to gather information, make decisions and initiate action.

The scientists then chemically damaged the olfactory nerves in the nose. The rats with the damaged nerves had three times less uranium in the olfactory system than the rats with intact olfactory nerves.

These finding suggests that inhaled uranium can travel directly from the nose along the olfactory nerves to the front of the brain. The olfactory pathway, then, plays an important role in inhaled uranium reaching the brain.

It is not known from this study if soldiers and civilian workers that breathe uranium could be at an even higher risk for cognitive effects or if inhaled uranium may affect brain function in similar ways as when it is carried through the blood. It is also unclear if these findings would hold true for the human brain since the rat brain is much more developed for smelling than the human brain.

Assessing these possible risks and determining if people’s relatively underdeveloped sense of smell could protect the brain would require further studies of people exposed to uranium through inhalation.

No 2.

Abstract

http://tinyurl.com/2ff6tcz

Uranium presents numerous industrial and military uses and one of the most important risks of contamination is dust inhalation. In contrast to the other modes of contamination, the inhaled uranium has been proposed to enter the brain not only by the common route of all modes of exposure, the blood pathway, but also by a specific inhalation exposure route, the olfactory pathway. To test whether the inhaled uranium enter the brain directly from the nasal cavity, male Sprague–Dawley rats were exposed to both inhaled and intraperitoneally injected uranium using the 236U and 233U, respectively, as tracers. The results showed a specific frontal brain accumulation of the inhaled uranium which is not observed with the injected uranium. Furthermore, the inhaled uranium is higher than the injected uranium in the olfactory bulbs (OB) and tubercles, in the frontal cortex and in the hypothalamus. In contrast, the other cerebral areas (cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and brain residue) did not show any preferential accumulation of inhaled or injected uranium. These results mean that inhaled uranium enters the brain via a direct transfer from the nasal turbinates to the OB in addition to the systemic pathway. The uranium transfer from the nasal turbinates to the OB is lower in animals showing a reduced level of olfactory receptor neurons (ORN) induced by an olfactory epithelium lesion prior to the uranium inhalation exposure. These results give prominence to a role of the ORN in the direct transfer of the uranium from the nasal cavity to the brain.

http://tinyurl.com/2ff6tcz

[End]

The Notes are an integral part of the article. Include when distributing. CopyRight by Bob Nichols 2010. Feel free to distribute with attribution and Notes.

Related Articles.
“PTSD, infertility and other consequences of war,” April 27, 2010, Bob Nichols, VeteransToday dot com http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/04/27/ptsd-infertility-and-other-consequences-of-war/ Or, http://tinyurl.com/22w8qpy

Notes:
“Uranium travels nerves from nose to brain.”
Synopsis by Paul Eubig, DVM Jul 31, 2009, Environmental Health News.
Role of the olfactory receptor neurons in the direct transport of inhaled uranium to the rat brain, Benjamin B. Tourniera, Sandrine Frelona, Elie Tourloniasa, Laurence Ageza, Olivia Delissena, Isabelle Dublineaub, François Paqueta and Fabrice Petitot, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Laboratoire de Radiotoxicologie Expérimentale, IRSN/DRPH/SRBE/LRTOX, Site du Tricastin, B.P. 166, 26702 Pierrelatte Cedex, France, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Laboratoire de Radiotoxicologie Expérimentale, IRSN/DRPH/SRBE/LRTOX, 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France, Received 27 March 2009; revised 26 May 2009; accepted 27 May 2009. Available online 9 June 2009, Toxicology Letters Volume 190, Issue 1, 8 October 2009, Pages 66-73

“Sublethal Effects of Waterborne Uranium Exposures on the Zebrafish Brain: Transcriptional Responses and Alterations of the Olfactory Bulb Ultrastructure,” Ad, Jean-Paul Bourdineaud, Karlijn van der Ven§, Tine Vandenbrouck§, Patrice Gonzalez, Virginie Camilleri, Magali Floriani, Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace and Christelle Adam-Guillermin, Laboratoire de Radio

Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44 (4), pp 1438–1443, DOI: 10.1021/es902550x, Publication Date (Web): January 20, 2010, Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society

Google: uranium + olfactory For 102,000 responses with uranium and olfactory on the same page, Bob Nichols, Sep 29, 2010. Many will apply.

A second source for: “Role of the olfactory receptor neurons in the direct transport of inhaled uranium to the rat brain.” Toxicol Lett. 2009 Oct 8;190(1):66-73. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19501638 http://tinyurl.com/24fljoc

lunedì 20 settembre 2010

By Way of Deception, We Shall do War

“By Way of Deception, We Shall do War”
by Deanna Spingola
September 16, 2010


Lenin Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) said, “The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.” [1] Worldwide control obviously requires extraordinary organization, superior weaponry and high technology (like HAARP), political power and monopoly control of all the resources. On February 17, 1950, James P. Warburg declared to the U.S. Senate, “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent. [2] In Russia and China and other countries, the elite used thugs for their violent conquest of existing leaders.

Populations wouldn’t knowingly consent to their own demise. But distracted, naïve, ignorant citizens, by their consent, relinquish their liberties by placing their trust in others, (1) two-faced lying politicians who have abandoned the constitution and sold their souls and, (2) the persuasive profit-driven elite media. Smiling talking heads and brilliant, fast-talking female lawyers in low-cut garments legitimize immodesty while peddling infotainment disguised as news. They equivocate among themselves over the Neocon’s next war target which they claim is necessary to keep America safe. While selling their illusions and building our perceptions, what to wear, eat, drink, think and who to fear, they conceal, suppress or gloss over stories that are actually pertinent to our lives.

Jacob H. Schiff, Paul Warburg and other bankers influenced Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act (December 23, 1913). The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was created in October 1913 to minimize predictable criticism. The bankers have manufactured panics, withdrawn credit and in the process have confiscated the citizen’s resources and personal property through phony bailouts, sanctioned by compromised politicians. These actions are calculated and designed to ultimately decimate the economy. The same bankers who promoted the Federal Reserve funded Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Molotov and Kirov (assumed names) in their godless, violent take-over of Russia. The bankers began making major profits when Bernard Baruch, Louis Brandeis and others manipulated their puppet Woodrow Wilson into entering World War I on borrowed money after the provoked attack on the Lusitania. Bankers
Winston Churchill Winston Churchill, a Rothschild minion, referred to the Americans traveling on the ill-fated Lusitania as “live bait,” a tactic for involving the U.S. in World War I, which started the flow of money from the pockets of U.S. citizens into the vaults of Rothschild and his fellow bankers. The “live bait” tactic had been successfully used with the deaths of American sailors aboard the USS Maine. Banker-backed corporate moguls exploited the situation. Their political puppets then ordered the military to invade the resource-rich Philippines. Meanwhile, the media vilified and dehumanized the innocent Filipinos so that the invaders could rationalize killing them. Mogul minions followed up by gathering cheap labor to extract resources and the government seized land to build military bases to manage the population and protect the resources.

To legitimize propaganda for World War I, Walter Lippmann persuaded President Wilson to create the official Committee on Public Information (CPI) on April 13, 1917. Wilson appointed newspaper publisher, George Creel, as chairman. Creel commissioned the nation’s artists to produce paintings, posters and cartoons to promote the war. With the expert help of Edward Bernays, “the father of public relations” and a nephew of Sigmund Freud, the CPI manufactured the most atrocious hate propaganda against the Germans. Bernays manipulated public opinion through crowd psychology, his uncle Sigmund’s specialty. Creel had a staff of persuasive wordsmiths – journalists, writers, intellectuals and many advertisers – who later admitted they were willing to lie, use emotional appeal and enemy demonization to generate hate and fear to elicit support for the war. [3]


In anticipation of entering another war, on July 11, 1941, President Roosevelt created the Office of Coordinator of Information (COI, and appointed William J. Donovan, a millionaire Wall Street lawyer, as its head. [4] Communist apologist Eleanor Roosevelt, Wendell Willkie, George Field, Dorothy Thompson, Herbert Bayard Swope, and prominent journalists, academics, trade unionists, theologians, and public officials founded Freedom House, a CFR front, in October 1941. FDR encouraged the group’s covert propaganda activities as he hoped it would persuade U.S. citizens to accept entry into World War II. Freedom House was also instrumental in facilitating and supporting post-war policies like the Marshall Plan, NATO, and the UN. [5] The Marshall Plan transferred U.S. tax dollars into the hands of the elite, camouflaged as a humanitarian effort. U.S. taxpayers rebuilt bombed-out foreign countries with the stipulation that the money be spent with banker-backed U.S. companies who raised their prices for those foreign customers.

The U.S. embargoed Japan, which depended on imports, to provoke a military response. Churchill and Roosevelt, whose governments had broken the Japanese communication codes, then monitored the progress of Japan’s military expedition to Pearl Harbor where unwary military personnel, “live bait,” 2,402 people were killed on December 7, 1941. After Japan’s retaliatory attack, the media vilified and dehumanized them. The U.S. government, urged by California farmers, also forcibly relocated and interned 110,000 Japanese Americans, mostly west coast farmers who typically sold their produce more competitively than the Caucasians. The government put the Japanese in detention camps and froze all of their assets. At least 80,000 of those individuals had been born in America. Pearl Harbor

On June 13, 1942, after the U.S. entered the war, the COI’s propaganda department joined the new Office of War Information (OWI) and was renamed the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) still under Donovan’s direction. [6] The OSS developed worldwide clandestine capability and employed almost 13,000 men and women. [7] It conducted psychological warfare, often used by governments to marshal the troops for warfare. This included constant repetition of fabricated atrocity stories to prove that the enemy was evil and had to be eliminated. [8]

In 1942, the State Department and CFR members collaborated to set up a new “supranational organization” to replace the League of Nations, based on Wilson’s internationalist ideas. [9] Secretary of State Cordell Hull (CFR) asked Communist Alger Hiss to assemble a group of fourteen other CFR members to draft the United Nations Charter (UN). [10] The UN Charter displaced the U.S. Constitution with little response from the voters who were traumatized by Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor. U.S. Senators accepted the charter without even viewing a copy. They were not authorized to bind U.S. citizens, without their consent, to the conditions of the U.N. charter. [11] Stalin would join the allies only if the U.S. would accept the UN. On April 12, 1952, Secretary Dulles would claim, “Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President.” [12]

Truman suspended OSS operations on October 1, 1945. Its leaders, trained personnel and assets were ultimately transferred into the newly created Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) via the National Security Act, July 26, 1947. Among the transferees to the CIA were four future CIA Directors, Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey. The CIA, created and staffed by the elite, is a worldwide organization to perpetrate covert terrorist activities. It has links to Britain’s MI6 and to the Israeli Mossad. Truman struggled to regularize the CIA’s psychological warfare, one of the agency’s greatest propaganda triumphs. [13]

The CIA’s activities, per the official government directive, included the following, propaganda; economic warfare; preventive direct action, including industrial sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance movements, guerrilla and refugee liberation groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist or now anti-nationalist elements in countries around the world. Such operations should not include armed conflict by recognized military forces, espionage, counter-espionage, and cover and deception for military operations.” [14]

Presidents Truman and Eisenhower introduced and mobilized propaganda as an official peacetime practice. Gun-toting dictators make demands but democracies use propaganda to persuade citizens to accept ideas, points of view, or policy positions as if the communication were immediately or ultimately their own. [15] Truman established the Psychological Strategy Board, as part of the CIA, on April 4, 1951 with Gordon Gray (CFR) as the first Director. Henry Kissinger, a Harvard professor, was Gray’s consultant. [16] The CIA published and disseminated hundreds of books promoting the official Cold War party line. A CIA-backed, worldwide media network provided cover for their agents and allowed the distribution of misinformation that predictably spread to the U.S. via the wire services, which also employed CIA agents who prevented problematic facts from gaining public exposure. [17]

Frank Wisner, along with Allen Dulles, Richard Helms and Phillip Graham (publisher of The Washington Post and husband of CFR/Trilateralist Katharine Graham) established Operation Mockingbird, the CIA program designed to control the U.S. media. [18] For decades U.S. “news” has been fabricated. In 1981, CIA Director William Casey said, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

In 1948, according to John F. Kennedy, many of Truman’s supporters abandoned him because he supported the Morgenthau Plan and other questionable issues. On his whistle-stop campaign train during the presidential race, an avid U.S. Zionist delivered a suitcase containing $2 million in cash which gave him the financial boost he needed to win in what was considered the greatest election upset in U.S. history. [19] Truman believed, as a result of the Holocaust, that Jews were oppressed and deserved a homeland. The British relinquished the problem of a shared Arab-Jewish state to the UN on April 2, 1947 because of Jewish terrorism in Palestine. President Truman instructed a reluctant State Department to endorse the UN’s partition plan of November 29, 1947. At midnight on May 14, 1948, Israel’s Provisional Government announced the new State of Israel. On that same day, like Roosevelt’s recognition of the Soviet government, Truman officially recognized the Zionist government in Palestine against the advice of many people. Truman didn’t bother to tell leading State Department officials who became angry when they heard about it. On May 15, 1948, the Arab states responded by invading Israel which began the first Arab-Israeli war. [20] Zionists held only 7% of the land when they proclaimed their state. After Truman’s recognition, public relations experts started promoting the phrase “Judeo-Christian” to help establish America’s “special relationship” with Israel.

Dwight D. Eisenhower was president of Columbia University (1948–1953) just before he was installed as U.S. president. Bernard Baruch first met the like-minded Eisenhower in 1928. Rockefeller and Morgan agents and numerous CFR members backed Eisenhower, a womanizing scoundrel, in the presidential election in 1952. After his nomination he told the President of the United Synagogue of America, “The Jewish people could not have a better friend than me …I grew up believing that Jews was the chosen people and that they gave us the high ethical and moral principles of our civilization.” [21] He accommodated the OSS in their covert assassination of General George S. Patton [22] who opposed the Morgenthau Plan and Eisenhower’s death camps and was going to reveal Eisenhower’s close collaboration with the Soviets. Eisenhower halted the U.S. troops in order to allow the Soviets to “liberate” Berlin. Ilya Ehrenburg, the head of Soviet propaganda directed the Soviet troops to ravage and rape the German women. At least 50,000 and perhaps as many as 100,000 females of every age were savagely raped; many of them were tortured and killed. [23]

By 1953, the CIA had 7,200 people working on covert actions, activities that took 74% of the CIA’s yearly budget. [24] The CIA always recruited their leaders from the elite class – businessmen, credible journalists, Ivy League scholars and Wall Street lawyers and bankers. Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, and William F. Buckley, Jr. were connected to the CIA.

George Washington, in his farewell address, advised Americans to avoid an “unnatural connection with any foreign power” and “to have with them as little political connection as possible.” [25] Apparently, future leaders ignored that advice. By June 1953, the U.S. government had given Israel $293,000,000 with an additional of $200,000,000 as Export-Import bank loans. The New York Herald-Tribune of March 12, 1953 reported that, in the first five years of Israel’s existence, including gifts, the total amounted to $1,000,000,000. This was in addition to the money they extracted from Germany. [26]

Irving Kristol
Irving Kristol
Beginning in 1953, Irving Kristol (CFR), “the godfather of neo-Conservatism,” and a former Trotskyite (opposed Stalin’s focus on Russia in preference of a worldwide system), co-edited the magazine Encounter, published in London and financed by the CIA. It was the voice of the CIA-funded Congress for Cultural Freedom and regularly promoted Fabian Socialism and the Labour Party. Kristol was also the editor of Commentary (1947-1952) and the editor of The Reporter (1959-1960). Kristol moved his family back to the U.S. by 1960. Daniel Bell (CFR) and Kristol founded The Public Interest (1965-2002), a publication of Freedom House, under the direction of George Field, its executive director. Field was also chairman of the RAND School for Social Science which was owned by the American Socialist Society and financed by the Garland Fund. Both Bell and Kristol were subsidized by the CIA, through the Congress for Cultural Freedom, the same organization that funded some of Gloria Steinem’s social engineering activities. Bell worked for Henry Luce (S&B, CFR) and advocated the dissolution of all borders and local governments.

Irving Kristol founded and published The National Interest (1985-2002). He was a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a member of the American Enterprise Institute and a John M. Olin Distinguished Fellow (1988-1999). He contributed a monthly column to the Wall Street Journal (1972-1997). He served on the Council of the National Endowment for the Humanities (1972- 1977). From the 1950s forward, chaos, in various strategic places, has reigned, perpetrated primarily by the CIA in conjunction with foreign intelligence agencies.

In 1954, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles ordered the CIA’s Saigon Military Mission (SMM) to engage in guerrilla warfare operations in Vietnam. Dulles told these “agent provocateurs” to “raise hell.” [27] The turmoil was then blamed on the local citizens, who were now referred to as the insurgency. CIA Director Allen Dulles assigned Edward Lansdale and his CIA cohort Lucien Conein, to engage in unconventional warfare in Vietnam where they created the Vietnam Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG). [28] In June 1954, the SMM established a campaign of undercover military and psychological warfare. They had unlimited U.S. taxpayer dollars and engaged in political, psychological and terrorist activities against the native population in the northern regions, especially in Hanoi and in the surrounding Tonkin area. They polluted petroleum supplies, sabotaged the railroad, tried to destroy the largest printing business in the North, bombed the post offices, and distributed millions of propaganda leaflets to incite fear and vast amounts of counterfeit money which created calculated inflation. [29]

When the Tonkinese villagers, mostly Catholic, were sufficiently frightened and intimidated, the CIA offered to transport them from the north to the south. The CIA manipulated the Catholic hierarchy who then urged thousands of Catholics to evacuate. [30] Those resistant to relocation were told that the U.S. was going to use the atomic bomb on them if a civil war erupted between the north and the south. [31] Weapons and agents were left in the north with an abundance of CIA-supplied counterfeit currency to continue the economic destabilization. [32]


Tens of thousands of the terrorized citizens fled on foot. The CIA transported the remainder via their Civil Air Transport Airlines (CAT) and U.S. Navy ships at a cost of about $100 million. The Catholics were moved into a predominately Buddhist population which intentionally created religious, civil, and economic strife. [33] The CIA and the Mossad are expert in population relocation in order to provoke civil and religious strife. The deliberate decimation of Mexico’s peso in the mid 1990s (and Bush’s de facto North American Union) created an influx of desperate Mexicans into the U.S, in conjunction with the drug cartel’s operations. Zionists expelled 750,000 Palestinians from their homeland in 1948; forced another 350,000 to flee Gaza in 1967 and forced another 147,000 Syrians from the Golan Heights in order to repopulate the areas, without compensation. Of course, the media suppresses these terrorist activities. Also, U.S. warfare in the Middle East caused thousands of dispossessed Muslims to flee elsewhere. This ongoing clash of cultures, the foreign incursion into America’s diminishing economy and deindustrialization (by corporate outsourcing for cheaper labor) creates tension. The media incites religious and economic outrage while concealing the cause and effect activities of the real culprits who prey on all of us.

In 1954, Israeli agents working under cover planted bombs in several Egyptian buildings, including a U.S. facility. The Israelis were trying to flip U.S. support of Egypt to Israel. So they planted evidence implicating the Arabs. However, one of the bombs detonated prematurely. The Egyptians captured one of the culprits who revealed the identities of the other members of the Israeli espionage group, some of whom were from Israel and others were local Jews. Often Israelis move to other countries, hold dual citizenship, and engage in dubious activities while working in government positions and other influential positions, in opposition to the best interests of the host country. The Israeli media immediately denied all culpability and claimed that it was a scam perpetrated by “anti-Semites,” a convenient oft-used ruse to silence justifiable criticism. However, in a subsequent trial, individuals produced clear-cut evidence that proved Israeli involvement in the bombing. Top Israelis blamed Israel’s Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon; he resigned. The operation is known as the Lavon Affair or Operation Susannah. Regarding anti-semitism, Norman G. Finkelstein wrote, “The new anti-Semitism actually incorporates three main components: (1) exaggeration and fabrication, (2) mislabeling legitimate criticism of Israeli policy, and (3) the unjustified yet predictable spillover from criticism of Israel to Jews generally.” [34]

On December 11, 1955, the Syrians captured five Israeli soldiers who were in the process of installing a wiretapping apparatus on the Syrian telephone network. The Israeli’s version of the event was that the five men had been abducted in Israel and taken to Syria and tortured. Public opinion was skewed in Israel and in the West in favor of Israel. By then, Israel had diverted the flow of the Jordan River at the expense of the area’s other inhabitants. On October 1, 1955, the U.S. government, through the CIA, gave Israel the “green light” to attack Egypt. [35]

I was in Israel in 1999 when our group received special permission to visit a specific site on the Jordan River which was little more than a tiny stream of putrid water. It was, at that time, guarded by several gun-totting Israeli soldiers. Our tour group was repeatedly warned not to discuss Christianity with any Israeli citizen as they have disdain for Christians. According to the Talmud (Traditions of the Elders), Jesus led Israel astray; his mother Mary was an adulterer and a whore and Jesus is in hell, in boiling excrement. The Talmud states that Christians will also be in hell for eternity in “boiling excrement” if they oppose “Judaism.” Jewish sages encourage their followers to daily recite the following “Blessed be thou who hast not made me a goy.” [36] Goy is a negative term for gentile; some say it means cattle.

In October 1960, just prior to the presidential election, John F. Kennedy visited with his good friend, Charles Bartlett, a journalist. The previous evening, Kennedy had been the dinner guest of an elite group of wealthy, influential Jews at the New York home of Abraham Feinberg, chairman of the American Bank and Trust Company. Their spokesman told Kennedy that they recognized that his campaign was in financial difficulty. The group then offered significant financial help if Kennedy as president “would allow them to set the course of Middle East policy over the next four years.” [37]

Bartlett recalled, “He said if he ever did get to be president, he would push for a law that would subsidize presidential campaigns out of the U.S. Treasury. He added that whatever the cost of this subsidy, it would insulate future presidential candidates from this kind of pressure and save the country a lot of grief in the long run.” Congressman Paul Findley (1961-1982) inquired further and discovered that Adlai E. Stevenson had a similar experience in 1956. [38]

Findley wrote, “Ethnic group pressure is an ever-present part of U.S. partisan politics, and because the president of the United States is the executor of all foreign policy, and the formulator of most of it, pressures naturally center on the people who hold or seek the presidency. When the pressure is from friends of Israel, presidents—and presidential candidates—often yield.” [39] This has been the case since Truman’s presidency (1945–1953). Condoleezza Rice once said, “We have an Israel-centric foreign policy.” Regarding Iraq, Findley said, “Our forces invaded because Israel wanted us to topple Saddam. Two religious communities – one consisting of a combination of secular and ultra-Orthodox Jews and the other of misguided Christian fundamentalists – control U.S. Middle East policies.” [40]

By 1977, Washington Post journalist Carl Bernstein said that over 400 journalists, distinguished reporters and foreign correspondents were CIA employees. A high-level source told Bernstein, “One journalist is worth twenty agents.” Pulitzer Prize winner Arthur Schlesinger, a former OSS agent transferred to the CIA. [41] The CIA, before 1990, paid college professors to write at least 1,200 propagandistic, anti-Communist books about places like the Soviet Union, Vietnam, China, Cuba and the Congo. [42] Columbia University, along with other schools, is a CIA recruiting ground. The Communists recruited Whittaker Chambers when he was there.

Prior to 1967, Islamic fundamentalism was a relatively small movement. Osama bin Laden, supported by the CIA, headed the al Qaeda network. Al Qaeda, referred to as the database, was part of a CIA operation after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979, part of Columbia professor Zbigniew Brzezinski’s plan to destabilize the Soviet Union. Brzezinski (CFR), the founding Director of the Trilateral Commission and a Rockefeller minion with CIA ties as early as 1959, was President Carter’s National Security Advisor (1977-1981). By 1984, the CIA supplied textbooks for Afghan students through USAID, a CIA front group. The textbooks were written under the direction of Dr. Thomas Gouttierre, head of Afghanistan Studies at the University of Nebraska where the books were published. Dr. Gouttierre is friends with Zalmay Khalilzad (CFR), U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan and Iraq (2003). Khalilzad, an Afghan-born Muslim was a former adviser to Unocal and was an Assistant Political Science Professor at Columbia University (1979-1986) where he worked closely with Brzezinski.

The textbooks were designed to create a militaristic populace in order to provoke resistance to the Soviets and future enemies. The book’s illustrations included tanks, land mines and missiles and promoted hatred. [43] The U.S. supplied these incendiary textbooks (1984-1994) under Presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush (S&B). Bush was Vice President under Reagan (1981-1989). All CIA records regarding Bush and his company, Zapata covering 1960 to 1966 were destroyed when he became vice president in 1981. Bush was CIA director (1976-1977).

In 1982, President Reagan created the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in order to acceptably manage CIA activities. Freedom House, the group created in 1941, became a part of this network. NED helped to finance Freedom House. Paul Wolfowitz, in the early 1980s, along with his neoconservative allies, collaborated with numerous Trotskyites. With the hidden funding and under the cover of conservative think tanks, the U.S. government can influence the public and conceal its interventions in foreign politics.

At least six million people had perished by 1987 as a result of the CIA’s covert operations. Not only is the CIA not an intelligence agency, it distorts information and perpetuates misinformation and disinformation to justify its own goals. This wide-range deception has resulted in organized terrorism throughout the world. Using the CIA, our government routinely dismisses or ignores national and international laws under the guise of “national security.” [44]

Interestingly, alarm over Islamic fundamentalism actually occurred at about the same time that Reagan called for the dismantlement of the Berlin Wall, formally concluded on October 3, 1990, followed by the official collapse of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1991. With Soviet Communism gone and the Berlin Wall dismantled, the State Department would either be forced to create another enemy or decrease their defense budget to about half of what it had been which would really cut into the elite’s profits. Shortly thereafter, the first Gulf War was devised to purportedly protect the oil resources of the Middle East against so-called “rogue states and nuclear outlaws.” [45] Islamic fundamentalism, our latest enemy, replaced Communism.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf (CFR), the man behind the proposed Muslim community center two blocks from ground zero, came to the U.S. with his family in 1965. In 1997 he founded the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMS), a tax-exempt foundation. Its mission statement states, “We collaborate with other faith-based organizations to build relationships of trust through dialogue and education, honoring the diversity of faiths, sharing commonalities, and celebrating differences.” [46] Interestingly, ASMS is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers; the Carnegie Corporation of New York; Rockefeller Philanthropy; Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Global Fund for Women; The Russell Family Foundation; Danny Kaye & Sylvia Fine Foundation; Graham Charitable Foundation; Henry Luce Foundation; Hunt Alternatives; The Ms. Foundation and other elite tax-exempt foundations. [47] The people who sign the check determine the policy. Are all of these people on the same team, playing the public and causing controlled conflict?


In 1972, Gloria Steinem (CIA agent extraordinaire), Patricia Carbine, Letty Cottin Pogrebin and Marlo Thomas founded The Ms. Foundation. [48] Steinem’s social engineering activities led to Roe v. Wade. Pogrebin authored In Defense of the Law of Return for The Nation on December 22, 2003, a law passed in Israel on July 5, 1950 which grants any Jew automatic citizenship. [49] Pogrebin, a financial contributor to Obama since 2004, [50] is a member of Americans for Peace Now (APN) the most prominent American Jewish Zionist organization working to achieve a comprehensive political settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict. [51] Steinem
Gloria Steinem
Bill Kristol
Bill Kristol
Former Harvard professor, William “Bill” Kristol, the son of Irving Kristol, was Chief of Staff to Vice President Dan Quayle, under the first Bush regime. Bill Kristol founded the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a tax-exempt foundation, in the spring of 1997, the same year that Rauf founded the ASMS. PNAC, with close ties to the American Enterprise Institute, was funded by the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation and the Bradley Foundation. Its objectives are U.S. Global supremacy and a “Greater Israel.” Twenty-five people signed their mission statement, seventeen of whom belong to the CFR, whose objective is a one-world government. Founding members include Elliott Abrams (CFR), Gary Bauer, William J. Bennett (Irving Kristol’s protégé), Jeb Bush, Richard B. Cheney (CFR), Eliot A. Cohen (CFR), Midge Decter (CFR), Paula Dobriansky (CFR), Steve Forbes, Aaron Friedberg (CFR), Francis Fukuyama (CFR), Frank Gaffney, Fred C. Ikle (CFR), Donald Kagan (CFR), Zalmay Khalilzad (CFR), I. Lewis Libby (CFR), Norman B. Podhoretz (CFR), Dan Quayle, Peter W. Rodman (CFR), Stephen P. Rosen (CFR), Henry S. Rowen (CFR), Donald Rumsfeld, Vin Weber (CFR), George Weigel (CFR), and Paul Wolfowitz (CFR). In 1992 Libby and Wolfowitz wrote Defense Planning Guidance for Defense Secretary Dick Cheney.


Bill Kristol, advocates neoconservatism, the American version of Trotsky’s Bolshevism. Kristol, a Bilderberger, a Manhattan Institute trustee, is also the editor and co-founder, along with John Podhoretz, of the Weekly Standard Magazine, established September 17, 1995 and funded, at a loss, by Rupert Murdoch (CFR), a Zionist. This so-called conservative magazine, co-edited by Fred Barnes, promotes the warhawk mentality, the same message heard on numerous “conservative” talk shows and on Murdoch’s Fox Network. Weekly Standard contributors include Joseph Epstein, Charles Krauthammer (CFR), Brit Hume, a Fulbright scholar, [52] Tucker Carlson, Robert W. Kagan (CFR) foreign policy analyst and son of Donald Kagan (CFR), Yale Professor John Podhoretz (son of Norman Podhoretz) and others. In 1995 Kristol confessed to the New Yorker: “The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures.” [53] See a video on PNAC here (warning: language).


Norman B. Podhoretz (CFR), a Trotskyite, in his books has admitted that the reason for the Cold War was to weaponize Israel to fight the Arab nations. He belongs to the influential New York chapter of the American Jewish Committee, one of the leading Zionist organizations operating within the U.S. It publishes the “liberal-turned-conservative” Commentary magazine. [54] Kagan is a columnist for the Washington Post which was associated with the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird. He is a senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and wrote Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order.

Now, remembering that the CIA probably controls much of what we hear from the elite-owned media, according to Pew, 30% of all Americans obtain their news from talk radio and cable television – many never read a book. A large percentage get their “news” from the Fox Network whose employees receive the morning memo, a directive on how to spin the “news” of the day. Roger Ailes, former Republican campaign wizard, is president of Fox News Channel and chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group which has a throng of “journalists” and guests who push right-wing propaganda disguised as news. [55] According to a decision by the Florida Appeals Court on February 14, 2003 in the Jane Akre whistleblower lawsuit, the court agreed with Fox News that it is not against the law to distort or falsify the news in the U.S. [56]

In 1997, Israël Shahak wrote, “Since the spring of 1992, public opinion in Israel is being prepared for the prospect of a war with Iran, to be fought to bring about Iran’s total military and political defeat. In one version, Israel would attack Iran alone; in another it would ‘persuade’ the West to do the job.” [57] On January 26, 1998, the PNAC warhawks, in a letter to President Clinton, urged him to invade Iraq to depose Saddam Hussein.

In October 1998, the Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group completed a nine-month long study of the “technologies and defenses” against terrorists. The study group was a collaboration of the faculty of Harvard, MIT, Stanford and the University of Virginia. It was funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the Herbert S. Winokur Public Policy Fund at Harvard University. The group produced a report entitled: Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy. [58] An article based on the academic Study Group report appeared in the CFR journal Foreign Affairs in the November-December 1998 issue, the same year that PNAC wrote to President Clinton suggesting the removal of Hussein.

Zelikow The project director was Philip D. Zelikow, later the gatekeeper executive director of the 9/11 Commission. He earlier co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice (both members of Bush 41’s National Security Council) entitled Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft. Zelikow also authored The National Security Strategy of the United States which became the new preemptive war doctrine of the Bush administration written for then National Security Council Director, Condoleezza Rice who had worked on the Bush transition team. He had a hidden agenda – connect al Qaeda and Iraq. [59]

PNAC’s policy statements were compiled in Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, published in September 2000. We read, “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” [60] It appears that 9/11 was that new Pearl Harbor. As Shahak indicated, Israel was going to persuade the West to wage war. Just how would Israeli political leaders “persuade” the U.S. to invade their enemy, a country that has not militarily assaulted the U.S.? The elite, for over 100 years, has used false flag assaults and very pervasive media propaganda to win public support for their warfare. The CIA and their foreign intelligence counterpart, the Mossad, have lengthy experience in false flag tactics, the actual reason for their existence. At least two previous incidents, probably more, involved Israel.

On June 8, 1967, there was a failed attempt to use the “live bait” device, with government foreknowledge, with the USS Liberty. The Zionist owned U.S. media kept quiet about the Israeli attack on the ship. Then on October 12, 2000, the “live bait” tactic was used in the USS Cole where seventeen U.S. sailors were killed, and thirty-nine were injured. A small boat moved to the port side of the destroyer when all the sailors were gathering in the galley for lunch. An explosion occurred which created a 40-by-40-foot hole in the ship. Al Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, a CIA asset, took credit for the attack. Yet, samples of the explosives retrieved from the ship’s hull showed that materials used were only available in the U.S. and Israel. Then the “live bait” tactic was used on 9/11 to get the U.S. to remove Hussein and bomb Iraq back to the Stone Age. USS Liberty

9-11 Explosion Within twenty-four hours of 9/11 the media miraculously, as if all the information were prepared beforehand, revealed histories, photos, and details about the Muslim terrorists who allegedly perpetrated the attack. Bin Laden, who died in December 2001, even came back from the dead to claim responsibility. [61] Fox News announced his death on December 26, 2001. [62] Despite the terrorist’s amazing ability to subvert the military response apparatus of the world’s most powerful nation, they failed to cover their trail and left a substantial amount of easy-to-find fireproof evidence. Their unhindered assault on a specific section of the Defense Department halted an audit that would have exposed billions of dollars of stolen money that had been funneled to special friends. The Port Authority, after it lost a 10-year asbestos lawsuit on May 1, 2001, were stuck with a money-losing albatross that they couldn’t get a license to demolish. On July 24, 2001 Eisenberg of the Port Authority leased the towers to his friend Larry Silverstein. Almost prophetically, Silverstein quickly insured the towers against a terrorist attack. [63]
On September 20, 2001, PNAC members sent a letter to President Bush in which they urged him to wage the nation’s “first war of the 21st century” including the capture or killing of Osama bin Laden, and the capture and prosecution of any and all perpetrators of 9/11. They encouraged Bush to go after any other group that means us harm. They advocated the end of Hussein’s government and the financial and military support of any Iraqi opposition. They also encouraged him to go after Hezbollah and the countries that support them, Iran and Syria. If Iran and Syria fail to comply and cooperate then the U.S. should take action against those countries. They further recommended that the U.S. withhold support from the Palestinians in favor of support to Israel. [64]

The letter said, “…But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.” [65] Richard Perle said, “This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq, then we take a look around and see how things stand. This is entirely the wrong way to go about it... If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely, and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war ... our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” [66] Paul Wolfowitz said the anti-terrorism campaign has to be broad and sustained. “It's not going to stop if a few criminals are taken care of.” [67] Iran, another industrial competitor, is the next war target which brings us back to the subject of Feisal Abdul Rauf, the individual behind the Manhattan mosque project.

Rauf is a member of the World Economic Forum’s Council of 100, an organization composed of business, political, religious, media and opinion leaders that advocates openness and understanding between the West and Muslim world. [68] Rauf is also a member of the CFR’s Religious Advisory Committee, along with Jim Wallis, publisher of Sojourners. He has been an imam in New York City for twenty-seven years. The building project, the Cordoba House, a 13-story, $100 million project, is planned as a community center complete with a swimming pool, culinary school, art studios and other features. It is to be built on properly zoned, private property two blocks from ground zero. The city Landmarks Preservation Commission approved of the construction. However, the American Center for Law and Justice, founded by Reverend Pat Robertson, filed a lawsuit in a state court to dispute the commission’s decision. They could have built the facility, like any other private group, on private property, without public scrutiny. The media has driven this issue and incited anger.

Recall that Freedom House was organized in 1941 to promote World War II. They are still propagandizing. William Howard Taft IV (S&B, PNAC[69]) is its current chairman. It is an international non-governmental organization that endorses a one-world government and opposes all nationalist governments. It has offices in offices in Algeria, Hungary, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Uzbekistan, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine. Taft supports the Law of the Sea which places all of the oceans under the jurisdiction of the UN. Since 1941, the group has developed ties to the CIA, the Brookings Institution, the U.S. Institute of Peace and other institutions and government agencies. Freedom House, a propaganda vehicle, is also a front group for the CFR, the British counterpart of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. In 2005 Freedom House was receiving U.S. government funds “for clandestine activities inside Iran.”

The organization receives about 66% of its budget from the U.S. government. [70] See the list of their board members here. Other financing comes from the Scaife Family Foundation which finances many groups and individuals, especially those associated with the CFR, including, Newt Gingrich’s (CFR) GOPAC, the Federalist Society, the Media Research Center and Joseph Farah’s World Net Daily – all of which selectively dispense “conservative views.” The National Endowment for Democracy, a proponent for one world governance also finances Freedom House. [71]

Woolsey
CIA Director
R. James Woolsey (CFR, PNAC) former CIA Director (1993-1995) was a signatory on the 1998 letter to President Clinton calling for Hussein’s removal. On September 11, 2001, Woolsey claimed that Iraq was involved in the attack. A year later, he claimed that Iraq was also involved in the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center and the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Woolsey, a former Chairman of Freedom House board (2003- 2005) was a Rhodes Scholar and a Booz Allen Vice President (2002-2008). [72] He was part of the secretive North American Forum held in Canada, September 12-14, 2006. [73] In July 2006, Woolsey suggested that the U.S. bomb Syria. His wife, Suzanne H. Woolsey (CFR), has been a Director of the Fluor Corp., an engineering and contracting firm since February 3, 2004. By August 2004, Fluor had a $1.6 billion Iraqi reconstruction contract. Fluor made about $1.3 billion for reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina (August 23-29, 2005), [74] a storm (HAARP?) that displaced 1.5 million people and caused about $81.2 billion in damage. On September 26, 2005, Senator Mel Martinez hosted the Halliburton-sponsored “Katrina Reconstruction Summit” for no-Katrina-victims-need-apply contractors. [75]

Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom is now listed on the Hudson Institute web site. On November 15, 2005, Nina Shea (CFR), the Director of the Center for Religious Freedom at Freedom House presented a 19-page report to the Committee on International Relations of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations. This report describes the followers of Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi ideology and elaborates on the millions of Muslims who have relocated to the United States. Shea said, “Earlier this year, Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom released a report based on a year-long study of the radically intolerant Wahhabi ideology contained in documents spread, published, or otherwise generated by the government of Saudi Arabia and found in the United States. Extremist Wahhabism is Saudi Arabia’s state religion; it is also the Saudi government’s aim to propagate it and have it replace traditional and moderate interpretations of Islam worldwide, including within the United States.” [76]

Another report, Saudi Arabia’s Curriculum of Intolerance, issued on May 23, 2006, by Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom analyzed the textbooks used by the Saudi Ministry of Education by their elementary and secondary students. These textbooks, according to Freedom House, advocate hatred of anyone, including Muslims, who reject the Wahhabi dogma. The 2006 report was created by Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom which collaborated with the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs. Their study covered the textbooks used in Saudi Arabia and Saudi schools outside that country. The Institute for Gulf Affairs collected the books to be used in the study from families, teachers, and administrators associated with Saudi schools. Freedom House then had them translated. [77] Did USAID have anything to do with these textbooks?

Nina Shea said, “What is being taught today in Saudi public school textbooks about how Muslims should relate to other religious communities will poison the minds of a new generation of Saudis. Whatever changes have been made in the Saudi educational system, clearly more needs to be done.” The Saudi government had revised all of their educational materials to eliminate all intolerant materials. But, according to the Freedom House report, the textbooks “condemn and denigrate the majority of Sunni Muslims” who reject the Wahhabi brand of Islam. The report also claims that the textbooks encourage Muslims to “hate” Christians, Jews and other “unbelievers.” The Saudi public school system has 25,000 schools, with about five million students. They also have academies in nineteen world capitals. One of these is located just outside of Washington in Alexandria, Virginia. They all use the same religious textbooks. Saudi Arabia also distributes its textbooks around the world to many Islamic schools. [78]

Barack Obama, as I have previously written, was a CIA asset and attended Columbia University where Marxist apologist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, taught. Obama was born (1961), named, mentored, media puffed and financed into the White House by Soros, Rockefeller and other bankers. According to Wayne Madsen, Obama’s mother, grandparents and other associates were also CIA.

Former community organizer, Barack Hussein Obama, be he Muslim, Christian or a minion for Israel, is furthering the destruction of the U.S. economy per his agreement with the bankers when they financed his presidency. Citizens will blame the Muslim in the White House and take vengeance on U.S. Muslims as the destabilization continues. Obama, in 2008, committed his efforts to serving AIPAC’s agenda. He has links to Wright’s Christian (liberation theology) church in Chicago and has publicly implied that he is Muslim. Is he just a CIA chameleon who alters his rhetoric for his current audience? Or is this a distracting Psy Ops designed to distract and divide U.S. citizens while the elite privately snicker. He is still a community organizer but on a much larger scale.

Part of the operation has Republican Orly Taitz (b. 1960), the Jewish lawyer, dentist, and perhaps Mossad, along with Philip J. Berg, a Jewish Democrat are publicizing Obama’s Kenyan birth, a detail that was openly announced in 2004 when he was running for an Illinois senate seat. [79] Taitz emigrated from the Soviet Union to Israel in 1981 where she attended Hebrew University. In 1987 she met and quickly married a software engineer visiting from California named Yosef Taitz and soon she was in the U.S. She believes that Israel should “exterminate” the Arabs. She is associated with AIPAC and believes that Obama’s policies are “a clear and present danger to Israel.” [80] Ironically, in regard to the birth issue, Taitz said, “When you allow somebody with allegiance to other nations to become president, that’s extremely dangerous.” [81] Good Heavens, save us from the arrogant, blatant elites and their useful idiots.

Menorah That’s true for any political office. Three hundred members (69%) of the House of Representatives signed a letter addressed to Secretary of State Clinton affirming “the unbreakable bond” that exists between the U.S. and the State of Israel. Given that fact, I hardly think that the imposition of Sharia law is a viable threat. [82] As long as the “National Menorah” is prominently displayed at the White House[83] during the holidays instead of a Christian scene, I think U.S. citizens can be assured that Sharia law is not a threat.
Scientists understand that monotonous patterns produce a stupor that renders people vulnerable to hypnosis. Certain low-level frequencies or unperceived waves exist in radio and television, the normal vehicle for mass hypnosis. It is the prime method of controlling huge populations. [84] On 9/11, everything shut down, except our television sets; we were extra attentive and traumatized, the most effective of any indoctrination process. Many still believe that Muslims perpetrated 9/11.

Politicians, journalists, and media personalities are repeatedly expressing outrage over the possible construction of the Muslim community center two blocks from ground zero. This attention serves to ignite the emotions that we all felt that day, conveniently near the anniversary. It serves to re-establish the connection between 9/11 and the Muslims. It is a psychological operation of the most organized kind. The government has had almost a decade to reiterate their deceptive version of the event. Many naïve people, not wanting to complicate their lives with the horrible reality, believe the government/media’s first reports – it is easier than acknowledging that they’ve been so easily deceived.

Gingrich Former Speaker of the House, internationalist Newt Gingrich (CFR, NAFTA proponent), a recipient of millions from Sheldon Adelson, argues, “One of our biggest mistakes in the aftermath of 9/11 was naming our response to the attacks ‘the war on terror’ instead of accurately identifying radical Islamists (and the underlying ideology of radical Islamism) as the target of our campaign… Radical Islamism is more than simply a religious belief. It is a comprehensive political, economic, and religious movement that seeks to impose Sharia—Islamic law—upon all aspects of global society.” [85]

Madeleine Albright (CFR), while Secretary of State, said, “If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable nation.” [86] Over 170 million people were slaughtered by governments during the 20th century. Ten million died in World War I and fifty million died in World War II. Of those who were killed during World War II, almost 70% were civilians. This so-called collateral damage was a consequence of indiscriminant bombing by Britain and America. [87] Then there was Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a potential war in Iran and the unpublicized CIA wars. Yet, many citizens, rather than focusing on America’s brutality, claim that Islam is violent.

The Muslims are not the enemy. They don’t extort usury through the Federal Reserve; they aren’t manufacturing population-reducing vaccines and GMO seeds; they didn’t devise our abortion laws (about fifty million dead); they didn’t bail out the banks; they didn’t create the Department of Homeland Security and impose the PATRIOT Act; they aren’t wiretapping our private conversations or scanning us at the airport; they didn’t impose godless Communism on several countries and cause the death of millions of innocent people; they haven’t instituted the draconian healthcare laws; they have not orchestrated the nation’s economic crashes; they have not deindustrialized the nation and outsourced so many jobs; they haven’t wiped out the middle class by passing trade laws like NAFTA; [88] and they haven’t foreclosed on thousands of homes; they are not the reason thousands of people live in tent cities; they haven’t developed depleted uranium weapons. Instead of worrying about a mosque, consider what’s going on behind the closed doors at the Federal Reserve, the Pentagon, the Senate and House chambers, the CFR, the State Department, the UN or dozens of other places. The Muslims didn’t instigate the attacks on the USS Liberty or the USS Cole and they didn’t orchestrate the highly organized attack in Manhattan on 9/11.

People should be burning the 9/11 Commission Report or if they insist on burning a religious book, burn the Bible or the Talmud instead of the Quran. Most of the people who insist that the Quran is full of hate have never even seen the book.


[1] The Synagogue of Satan, the Secret History of Jewish World Domination by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock, River Crest Publishing, Austin, Texas, 2007, p. 102

[2] Liberty Tree, http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quotes_about/debt

[3] Wartime Propaganda, World War I, “The War To End All Wars, http://www.100megspop3.com/bark/Propaganda.html

[4] Two Faces of Freemasonry by John Daniel, Day Publishing, Longview, Texas, 2007, pp. 99-100

[5] Freedom House Statement on the Passing of George Field, Washington, DC, June 1, 2006, http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=70&release=384

[6] OSS, the Secret History of America’s First Central Intelligence Agency by Richard Harris Smith, The Lyons Press, Guilford, Connecticut, 2005, pp. 1-2

[7] What Was OSS Many OSS Records have recently been declassified: Report to the IWG on Previously Classified OSS Records, June, 2000, https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/oss/art03.htm, http://www.archives.gov/iwg/reports/june-2000.html

[8] The Mind of Adolf Hitler, the Secret Wartime Report by Walter C. Langer, Basic Books. 1972, p. 4

[9] Bush’s New World Order: The Meaning Behind The Words by Major Bart R. Kessler, March 1997, pp. 7-9

[10] American Statesmen: Secretaries of State from John Jay to Colin Powell edited by Edward S. Mihalkanin, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 2004, p. 263

[11] The Liberty Committee, American Sovereignty Restoration Act, H.R. 1146, Analysis by Herbert W. Titus, Senior Legal Advisor, http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/hr1146analysis.htm

[12] The Supremacy Clause: a Reference Guide to the United States Constitution by Christopher R. Drahozal, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, Connecticut, 2004, p. 163

[13] Safe For Democracy, The Secret Wars of the CIA by John Prados, 2006, Chapter 5, The Covert Legions

[15] Age of Propaganda, the Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion by Anthony Pratkanis and Elliot Aronson, University of California, Henry Holt and Co., New York, 1992, pp. 9-10

[16] Harry S. Truman Papers Staff Member and Office Files: Psychological Strategy Board Files, Dates: 1951-53, http://www.trumanlibrary.org/hstpaper/physc.htm

[17] The CIA’s Greatest Hits by Mark Zepezauer, Odonian Press, Tucson, Arizona, 2002, pp. 52-53

[18] The CIA and Nazi War Criminals, National Security Archive Posts Secret CIA History Released Under Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 146, Edited by Tamara Feinstein, February 4, 2005, http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm

[19] Jewish History, Jewish Religion, the Weight of Three Thousand Years by Israel Shahak, Pluto Press, London, England and Boulder, Colorado, 1994, p. vii

[20] Harry S. Truman Library, the Recognition of Israel, http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/israel/large/index.php

[21] The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, Dolphin Press, Durban, South Africa, 1978, pp. 332-333

[22] Target Patton: The Plot to Assassinate General George S. Patton By Robert K. Wilcox, Regnery Publishing, Inc., Washington, 2008, pp. 169-170, 193-194

[23] After the Reich: the brutal history of the Allied occupation by Giles MacDonogh, Basic Books, New York, 2007, p. 26

[24] The Origins of the Overclass by Steve Kangas, http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-overclass.html

[25] Washington's Farewell Address 1796, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp

[26] The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, Dolphin Press, Durban, South Africa, 1978, p. 343

[27] JFK, the CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy by L. Fletcher Prouty, Carol Publishing Group, 1992, pp. 70-71

[28] The Secret History of the CIA by Joseph J. Trent, Carroll & Graf Publishers, New York, 2001, pp. 327-329

[29] JFK, the CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy by L. Fletcher Prouty, Carol Publishing Group, 1992, pp. 70-73

[30] Ibid, pp. 72-76

[31] The Secret History of the CIA by Joseph J. Trent, Carroll & Graf Publishers, New York, 2001, pp. 327-329

[32] Ibid, pp. 327-329

[33] JFK, the CIA, Vietnam and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy by L. Fletcher Prouty, Carol Publishing Group, New York, 1992, pp. 72-76

[34] Beyond Chutzpah, on the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History by Norman G. Finkelstein, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 2005, p. 66

[35] Israel’s Sacred Terrorism by Livia Rokach, Association of Arab-American University Graduates, 1985, this book is composed of excerpts from Moshe Sharett’s diary. He was Israel’s Prime Minister (1954-55) and Foreign Minister (1948-56), http://chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/essays/rokach.html

[36] The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling, The Noontide Press, Costa Mesa, California 1983, pp. 38-39

[37] They Dare to Speak Out, People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby by Paul Findley, Lawrence Hill Books, Chicago, Illinois, 1989, pp. 114-116 Findley lost his bid for reelection when pro-Israel supporters financed his opponent, Dick Durbin

[38] Ibid, pp. 114-116

[39] Ibid, pp. 114-116

[40] Our Israel-centric Foreign Policy by Paul Findley, The Huffington Post, June 9, 2005, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-findley/our-israelcentric-foreign_b_2378.html

[41] The CIA and the Media by Carl Bernstein, Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977

[42] The Praetorian Guard, the U.S. Role in the New World Order by John Stockwell, South End Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1991, p. 34

[43] Profile: Taliban, History Commons, http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=taliban

[44] How 6 million People Were killed in CIA secret wars against third world countries, http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4068.htm

[45] The War on Islam by Enver Masud, Madrasah Books, Arlington, Virginia, 2003, pp. 19-20

[46] ASMA Society, Mission Statement, http://www.asmasociety.org/home/

[47] Our Supporters: U.S. Foundations, http://www.asmasociety.org/home/p_support.html

[48] The Ms. Foundation for Women, History, http://ms.foundation.org/about_us/our-history

[49] In Defense of the Law of Return by Letty Cottin Pogrebin, The Nation, December 22, 2003,

[50] Campaign Contribution Search - Letty Cottin Pogrebin http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=NY&last=Pogrebin&first=Letty

[51] Americans for Peace Now, http://fedupusa.wordpress.com/americans-for-peace-now/

[52] Fulbright Scholarship Program Information, http://exchanges.state.gov/education/fulbright/ffsb/

[53] Big Lies, the Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How it Distorts the Truth by Joe Conason, Thomas Dunne Books, New York, 2003, p. 34

[54] The High Priests of War, The Secret History of How America’s “Neo-Conservative” Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in their Drive for Global Empire by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 38, 45

[55] Blinded by the Right, the Conscience of an Ex-Conservative by David Brock, Three Rivers Press, New York, 2002, p. 52

[56] The Media Can Legally Lie, Project Censored by Liane Casten, Spring 2003, http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/11-the-media-can-legally-lie/

[57] Open Secrets: Israeli Foreign and Nuclear Policies by Israël Shahak, Pluto Press, London, Chicago, Illinois, 1997, p. 54

[58] Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy By Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch and Philip D. Zelikow, 1998, http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/publication/terrorism.htm

[59] 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud, The Wisdom Fund, Arlington, Virginia, www.twf.org, 2008, pp. 9-10

[60] Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New American Century, the Project for a New American Century, September 2000, p. 51

[61] Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive by David Ray Griffin, Olive Branch Press, Northampton, Massachusetts, 2009, p. 14

[62] Ibid, pp. 2, 10

[63] Port loses claim for asbestos removal, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey by Douglas Mcleod, Business Insurance, May 14, 2001

[64] PNAC letter to George W. Bush, http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm

[65] Ibid

[66] A New Pearl Harbor, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/nc-pilger.html

[67] How Wide a War?, PBS, September 26, 2001, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/july-dec01/wide_war.html

[68] West-Islamic World Dialogue, http://www2.weforum.org/en/initiatives/c100/index.html

[69] Partial list of people associated with the Project for the New American Century, People identified as being connected to the PNAC because either they are listed on the organization’s web site, or their names appear as authors/contributors on official PNAC documents. Information current to Dec. 2004, http://www.reasoned.org/e_PNAC2.htm

[70] Freedom House Financial Statement, 2007, http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/special_report/72.pdf

[71] Ibid

[72] R. James Woolsey – Booz Allen VP, http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/analyst-wire/mi_8077/is_20100603/james-woolsey-vice-president-booz/ai_n53882161/

[73] Secret Rumsfeld Meeting To Implement North American Union, http://angelsfortruth.com/North%20American%20Union.html

[74] Rebuilding: At What Cost and in who’s Image by Rita J. King, Special to CorpWatch, August 16th, 2006

[75] Curbing Government Contractor Abuse, San Diego Union-Tribune By Charlie Cray, September 30, 2005, http://www.fpif.org/fpifoped/1283

[76] Testimony Of Nina Shea, Director Center for Religious Freedom, Freedom House Before The Committee on International Relations U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and

International Operations “In Defense of Human Dignity: The 2005 International Religious Freedom Report”

November 15, 2005, p. 16

[77] Freedom House Press Release, Revised Saudi Government Textbooks Still Demonize Christians, Jews, Non-Wahhabi Muslims and Other, Washington, DC, May 23, 2006, http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=70&release=379

[78] Ibid

[79] Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate, http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

[80] Orly Taitz: Obama policies are 'clear and present danger to Israel', The driving force behind the 'birther' movement has found her star is rising in Israel by Benjamin L. Hartman, Ha’aretz, http://www.haaretz.com/news/orly-taitz-obama-policies-are-clear-and-present-danger-to-israel-1.282161

[81] In Doubt’s Shadow, Soviet Jewish Émigré Orly Taitz is the ‘Queen Bee’ of the ‘Birther’ Movement, http://www.tabletmag.com/news-and-politics/11908/in-doubt’s-shadow/

[82] Nearly 300 Congress members declare commitment to 'unbreakable' U.S.-Israel bond, Letter to Clinton underscores Biden remarks that there is 'no space' when it comes to Israel's security by Natasha Mozgovaya, http://www.haaretz.com/news/nearly-300-congress-members-declare-commitment-to-unbreakable-u-s-israel-bond-1.266652

[83] Rahm Emanuel Lights National Menorah At White House, AP/ The Huffington Post, 12-13-09, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/13/rahm-emanuel-lights-natio_n_390552.html

[84] Operation Mind Control by Walter Bowart, Dell Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1978,

[85] Newt Direct, No Mosque at Ground Zero, July 28, 2010, http://www.newt.org/newt-direct/no-mosque-ground-zero

[86] Derailing Democracy, the America the Media Don’t Want You to See by David McGowan, Common Courage Press, Monroe, Maine, 2000, p. 167

[87] A Century of War: Lincoln, Wilson, and Roosevelt by John V. Denson, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama, 2006, p. 17

[88] Bill Clinton and his NAFTA Baby Co-Conspirators, http://www.nolanchart.com/article368.html


Comments: deannaATspingola.com

Soglie per la mutazione indotta dalle radiazioni?

  Articolo di revisione Soglie per la mutazione indotta dalle radiazioni? Il dibattito Muller-Evans: un punto di svolta per la valutazione d...