sabato 17 settembre 2011

Fukushima: Japan Goes to WAR


Fukushima: Japan Goes to WAR

33

Giant Nuke Weapons Aimed  at the US, Switched ON


Brutally strong external "tent" skeleton for Rad spewing reactors at Fukushima
Brutally strong external "tent" skeleton for Rad spewing reactors at Fukushima. Built to withstand what? An attack?

by Bob Nichols, VeteransToday


(San Francisco) – Japan is readying six huge, long acting nuclear weapons for immediate use against the country’s economic and military foes.  Chief among those is the United States. The weapon is radioactive poison gas from the six destroyed American reactors and old reactor cores at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.
Fukushima Daiichi is now fully weaponized in concept and, in just days, in real life.
Long denied their own nuclear weapons by the US, their WW II wartime conqueror, re-builder, Master and Patron, the Japanese are commonly thought by insiders to be capable of building nuclear weapons easily over a weekend. This aggressive approach is even  more ingenious and imaginative.
In an instant on March 11, 2011 at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station three, possibly six, large atomic reactors were turned into armed and functioning stationary nuclear weapons, ostensibly by a very large, curious earthquake and devastating tsunami.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’s six reactors transformed to possibly six huge radioactive isotope spewing nuclear weapons; potentially as much as the equivalent of about 2,000 Hiroshima Atomic Bombs over a period of months and even years. Japanese Prime Minister Kan and the Cabinet were notified immediately.
Unlike the Chernobyl nuclear disaster involving only one reactor six months out, the Fukushima smash up is no closer to being “contained,” as the government cheerfully puts it than it was on Day One – March 11, 2011
Atomic bombs, like the one that incinerated Hiroshima, create more than 1,400 radioactive and highly lethal “isotopes;” or, radioactive variations of the metal uranium. Atomic reactors do the same thing, since they are merely vastly slowed down, very large atomic bombs.
War Flag of the Imperial Japanese Army Wikipedia
War Flag of the Imperial Japanese Army Wikipedia
Now as a result of stunning Japanese ingenuity, the unparalleled nuclear fury, disease and concentrated death of the out-of-control reactors will be aimed directly at the United States. Nothing short of a full scale US invasion and bombing can turn the situation around. For more than six months Fukushima Nuclear Power Reactors have irradiated Japan and nearby countries such as Russia, China,  South Korea, and North Korea, for the most part. The “tents” turn that all around. The die is cast, the Japanese leadership has made their decision; so be it.
To date, American President Obama has done nothing that VeteransToday knows of to stem this dire, immediate and active nuclear threat to all residents of the United States.
The six Fukushima Daiichi nuclear weapons are in Northern Japan on the Pacific Coast facing the West Coast of the United States. Travel time from Fukushima to San Francisco, Seattle or Los Angeles is a few minutes by US space based weapons systems and others that are up there.
Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi poison gas nuclear fallout is deployed by steady easterly winds and is much more dependable than space based weapons. The one way trip from Fukushima’s crippled reactors to San Francisco, LA and Seattle takes 4 days by the ever present Jet Stream winds and as much as 9 days by lower level winds. This is nothing new; it has been the case since the Fukushima disaster March 11, 2011.
Overbuilt, armored and brutally strong "tent leg poles" are shown in this close up of an unfinished Fukushima radiation gas pump chimney (FRGPC) to poison millions of Americans.
Overbuilt, armored and brutally strong "tent leg poles" are shown in this close up of an unfinished Fukushima radiation gas pump chimney (FRGPC) to poison millions of Americans.
What is new is that the Japanese government, the Japanese self defense forces and their corporate favorite TEPCO, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, are encasing the semi-permanent radiation spewing Stationary Nuclear Weapons  (SNW) in giant building sized tents or weapons condoms.
Powerful fans collect and pump the highly radioactive uranium gas and aerosols through armored chimneys directly into the air far above Fukushima Daichi’s wrecked nukes. From there the Radioactive Gas (RadGas) heads East to the United States. Since poison gas is imprecise, Mexico and Canada are also at risk.  Japan’s weapons’ breakthrough was thinking of them as big nuclear weapons in the first place.
All in all, Fukushima Daiichi is a rather natural and organic weapons system with six known core devices manufactured by weapons maker GE (General Electric.) The nuke reactors’ design was first used in US fast attack nuclear submarines. The trashed nukes are now enormous nuclear weapons designed from the ground up to kill and maim American residents in large numbers.
The faithful, and dying, Japanese Kamikaze workers at Fukushima Daiichi could even hook up solar panels and tide based electrical generators for an almost limitless supply of free electricity to run the huge air pumps to push the hot radioactive gas and aerosols high into the air for decades; or, until they are destroyed, whichever comes first.
Destroy the RadGas Generators, Mr President
The building sized tents, concealed and armored chimneys and high velocity air pumps  constitute armed and firing nuclear weapons aimed at the United States.
The intensely radioactive poison gas is blanketing the US with no foreseeable end in sight. The President is left with no choice but to use any means necessary to protect the United States. As a result, nothing is “off the table.”
It is your move, Mr. President.
Copyright by Bob Nichols Sept 16, 2011. All rights reserved. Distribute with credit and all Notes and Sources. Reach Bob Nichols at duweapons@gmail.com
Sources and Notes:




lunedì 5 settembre 2011

Kodama furieux à cause des graves négligences du gouv. Jap

Fukushima, Pr Kodama furieux à cause des graves négligences du gouv. Japonnais (1-2)
Le Professeur Tatsuhiko Kodama est le directeur du centre de radio-isotopes à l'Université de Tokyo. Le 27 Juillet, il a comparu comme témoin au Comité des Affaires Sociales et du Travail dans la Chambre basse de la Diète (parlement) au Japon. [Partie 1/2]
Partie 2 dispo ici : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh68ieQGmiU

A la fin, le pr. Kodama a été en mesure de formuler seulement trois de ses quatre requêtes, probablement à cause de la contrainte de temps de parole.

(Traduction de la vidéo et du commentaire de Tokyobrowntabby disponibles ici : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlf4gOvzxYc)
Sous-titrage Français d'après EX-SKF, Helios & Miki Shunji (video de magna551).
Merci à eux.

giovedì 1 settembre 2011

Contamination interne et remédiation alimentaire

Contamination interne et remédiation alimentaire

AIPRI, 1 Sept. 2011

Cette lettre, rédigée par MEA en 2005, a été publiée avec l'autorisation du destinataire.

Chers amis de la vérité toute crue, celle qui frappe les menteurs en plein visage !

J’ai aujourd’hui 14 février 2005, reçu ce matin le livre écrit par Pierre, « La colère nucléaire ». C’est la première fois que je lis un livre d’une seule traite. Ah c’est un cri du cœur et des entrailles. Il m’a tout retourné ce livre de 60 pages ! Quelle manière sublime de dire la vérité. C‘est formidable. Pierre vous êtes vraiment « une voix qui mord à pleine dents dans la conscience ».

Vous êtes M. et Pierre, de vrais Français qui faites honneur à la France.

Par ailleurs il faut le plus vite possible prendre en mains le rétablissement de Pierre. Il existe 2 moyens :
1) expulser l’uranium de son corps;
2) rétablir au mieux la déstabilisation de son ADN.
3) Je précise que je ne suis pas médecin mais que je vous conseille des additifs alimentaires non offensifs très efficaces que je ferais prendre aux troupes en temps de guerre si elles étaient contaminées. Il ne s’agit donc pas de médicaments mais de ‘décontaminants’. Donc il ne s’agit pas de « prescription médicale » ni de tentative de « guérir » mais de décontaminer, ce qui entre dans mon brevet NBCR (protection nucléaire, biologique, chimique, radiologique).

Pour l’action 1. (expulser l’uranium)


Il existe deux additifs alimentaires utiles qui diminuent la demi période biologique des métaux lourds, dont l’uranium.


A: Le VITAPEK. C’est de la pectine de pomme conditionnée en Russie pour désintoxiquer les enfants et adultes contaminés par l’accident de Tchernobyl. C’est le Dr Michel Fernex et ses amis Russes qui ont découvert le moyen de décontaminer par l’absorption de pectine de pomme: un moyen simple miraculeux. Si des difficultés se présentaient, M. pourrait demander à sa pharmacie de lui fournir de la pectine de pomme en gélules.


B: L'algue Chlorella. Il existe aussi en maison de diététique des comprimés d’algues Chlorella qui est connue comme aide à la détoxication en métaux lourds. Ceux-ci peuvent être utilisés quand la pectine de pomme manque.

Pour l’action 2. (restabiliser l’ADN)

Les rayons ionisants déstabilisent l’ADN principalement aux liaisons hydrogènes, freinant ainsi la réplication de l’ADN par parasitage avec des radicaux libres. Dans ce cas, le chercheur feu Mirko Beljanski a trouvé que prendre des gélules de l’écorce de l’arbre PAO PERREIRA est bénéfique pour rétablir la stabilisation de l’ADN et a même guérit des cancéreux ce qui lui a valu les foudres des confrères jaloux, envieux et Labos, etc., au point qu’il a été littéralement « assassiné d’offenses et de tracasseries ignobles ». Sa femme est allée habiter New York.

Malheureusement cet additif alimentaire n’est pas vendu en France sous pression des lobbies pharmaceutiques et des Labos. Il existe un moyen de le commander aux USA sous le nom de « PAO V » à l’adresse suivante:

Courrier: Natural Source International - 150 East 55th Street - 2nd Floor - New York, NY 10022

Un flacon de 100 gélules de PAO V coûte cher: environ 85 euros.

MEA.

Nuclear Family Bonds

AFTER FUKUSHIMA, AUGUST 25, 2011 2:22PM

Nuclear Family Bonds

089

For 25 years, Hiroshima was the elder brother to Chernobyl. Now Chernobyl is elder brother to Fukushima.”

Japanese cherry blossoms radiate from the ghostly figure, dressed in what might be a shroud, or perhaps a gown, adorned with traditional Ukrainian embroidery. The new installation in the lobby of Ukraine’s Chernobyl Museum entwines the two nations with a poem about Kiev’s chestnut trees embracing Japan’s sakura like a sad and worried brother. Below it, a pair of French backpackers and a trio of Turks watch a video loop replaying the serial explosions that rocked the Fukushima Daichi nuclear plant after Japan’s March 11th earthquake and tsunami triggered the worst nuclear disaster since Unit 4 at the Chernobyl Atomic Energy Station (named after V.I. Lenin, naturally) exploded 25 years ago.

It seems ironic that the video screen bears the logo of Japan’s foreign development agency – a red sun hugging a blue globe. In 2010, Japan gave $74,000 to improve the museum’s displays, including touch screens and DVD players. Now, it is like a funhouse mirror, with the Japanese DVD players intended for showing scenes of the Soviet nuclear disaster 60 miles north of Kiev in what is now Ukraine showing scenes of the disaster in Japan instead.

Japan has supported Chernobyl studies and projects in Ukraine for years. Though one people suffered from the Bomb, and the other, a civilian nuclear plant explosion, both were bound by scars of the atomic age. That both, after Fukushima, are now also victims of the “peaceful atom” is almost getting weird. No two peoples could seem further apart in their stereotypes than the productive and dutiful Japanese from the ne’er do wells of post-Soviet Ukraine.

But they actually have more in common than you might think.

Both take their shoes off before entering a home. Both honor their ancestors with annual cemetery feasts. And both traditionally ward off evil spirits with sprigs of wormwood, sometimes mistranslated to the Ukrainian aschOrnobyl (or, more usually, bastardized in Russian as “chErnobyl) InWormwood Forest: A Natural History of Chernobyl, I used wormwood as a metaphor for expulsion, the ending of human life in a place because of radioactive contamination. Now Japan’s evacuated no-man’s lands await their own wormwood forests.

The world’s worst (so far) nuclear disaster happened in what was then the Soviet Union 25 years ago. Ukraine inherited it along with independence. It also bore the brunt of the clean up. Of 829,000 “liquidators” (so called because they were supposed to be “liquidating the consequences of the accident”, in the official parlance) from throughout the USSR, nearly half came from the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic – including the heavyweight Klitschko boxing brothers’ father, who recent died of cancer at 64.

Regardless of nationality, though, the vast majority of liquidators had no idea of what they were supposed to do there and most didn’t actually do very much.

That’s the opinion of Yuri Andreyev, the head of Ukraine’s Chernobyl Union, a non-governmental group for liquidators. As a 35-year-old engineer, he was in the control room 12 hours after the explosion hit Unit 4. “Only 20,000 people, maybe 30,000 did any good at Chernobyl,” he said in the Union’s modest three-room office, where employees bring their own lunch and anyone with a Chernobyl problem is welcome. The rest – more than 800,000 people – were sent there just to prove that the Communist government in Moscow was “doing something”. Their radiation exposures were completely unnecessary.

Some studies show liquidators have worse health than the general population. But the research is sufficiently flawed for the Ukrainian authorities to deny that specific illnesses were caused by radiation exposure and thus avoid paying for medical treatment. While Chernobyl’s 8000 thyroid cancers are well studied, neither governments nor nuclear industries have provided any significant funding for researching more controversial health effects of radiation such as breast cancer and heart disease. Whenever you hear that “there are no studies proving any connection between radiation and [insert medical condition]”, you can be pretty sure it’s because no studies have actually been done.

Though many of Andreyev’s fellow Chernobyl veterans have since fallen ill or died, those who remain collectively wield more knowledge about what to do – and what not to do – in a Level 7 nuclear disaster than just about any other group of people on earth. Given Japan’s long-standing nuclear bonds with Ukraine, you would think that that Tepco (Fukushima’s owner) or Tokyo would have called on that expertise at some point during the ongoing disaster.

Unfortunately, you would be wrong. While Kiev offered Tokyo its best nuclear disaster specialists within the first days, Japan turned them down. An outraged colleague from NBC who was in Kiev at the time told me it was because the Japanese didn’t want any associations with Chernobyl.

That’s the problem with nuclear energy. The industry has always treated safety as a PR problem, as though any admission that the technology was not perfectly safe would lead to the closure of every single plant tomorrow. Well, Fukushima showed that it isn’t perfectly safe and that disasters will happen. No one is even pretending otherwise anymore. And yet, the nuclear plants are still running and will continue for some time.

Eventually, Japan did accept some dosimeters and masks from Ukraine but never did take up the offer of nuclear disaster specialists.

Not officially, at least. According to Andreyev, the Japanese Embassy in Kiev quietly worked through Japanese-Ukrainian friendship societies and other NGOs to try to hire the specialists privately, as day laborers -- without any contracts.

“They wanted to lawlessly exploit our people’s qualifications and economic difficulties the same way they exploit their nuclear gypsies,” he said, referring to the migrant laborers drawn from Japan’s underclass to clean up the radioactive spills and other incidents that happen regularly in the nuclear industry. They have also been drafted into the Fukushima clean-up, lured by pay that would be a pittance for professionals. “But we said ‘no’,” Andreyev continued, as his next meeting poked her head in the door: a liquidator’s widow. “This can only be done by highly qualified personnel, with their own equipment and dosimeters, through an intergovernmental agreement.”

Andreyev clasps his hands on a desk stacked with magazines and books. A secretary comes in for his signature, but he waves her off. “The Japanese didn’t want that. They see themselves as the brightest in Asia and because of their arrogance, have made their disaster worse.”

Dr. Genn Saji, a former Japanese nuclear regulator who has so far sent out 134 email updates about Fukushima, had a different view. He blamed the “political amateurs” in Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s government, which hasn’t been tapping Japanese talent to deal with the disaster, much less international expertise. “They simply do not understand the specialized knowledge necessary for accident management,” he wrote in an email.

But I wouldn’t be surprised if at least part of what Andreyev was true. For 25 years, Hiroshima was the elder brother to Chernobyl. Now Chernobyl is elder brother to Fukushima. Officially accepting Ukraine’s experience would have meant acknowledging that the roles had reversed. Hiring it privately was less humiliating because Ukrainian day laborers would be subordinates and under Japanese control.

The result is that Fukushima could have been avoided, and if it could not have been avoided entirely, it could have been much less bad than it is.

Andreyev recites a litany of “stupidities” committed at Fukushima because no one heeded the lessons of Chernobyl: they shouldn’t have cooled the cores with water, they shouldn’t have dumped sand, they should have had back-up power at higher levels where it couldn’t flood.

Despite the obstacles, Andreyev has been trying to get his message out in many dozens of interviews with Japanese and other foreign media, sprinkled with tips like making sure that workers protect their heads. While radioactive particles wash easily off skin, hair must be shaved off if it is contaminated.

He cautions against building a heavy, concrete Sarcophagus around the ruined reactor core, as the USSR did at Chernobyl. The thing was never hermetically sealed, and was only supposed to be a temporary solution. But after 25 years, the Sarcophagus is now itself contaminated. What to do with it next would consume another article, but Andreyev suggested that the Japanese initially erect a light shielding of fabric or film to isolate the buildings from the environment.

When I told him that Tepco is planning a polyester shelter at Unit 1, Andreyev sighed. “At least that message got through.”

Sitting under photographs of the Chernobyl Unit 4’s blackened and cratered innards – before the Sarcophagus was constructed – Andreyev sounds exasperated when I ask him if Fukushima changed his mind about nuclear energy. “As of now, there are no other ways to preserve civilization,” he said, dismissing alternative fuels. “For windmills or solar to fuel all of Ukraine’s energy needs, they would have to cover 30% of our territory.”

Like it or not, we are stuck for the foreseeable future with the 440+ nuclear reactors around the world unless we all give up our electronic gizmos and condemn the developing world to the perpetual poverty that would shrink its growing appetite for energy.

If nuclear energy is as dangerous as Chernobyl and now Fukushima prove it to be, we have to somehow reduce those dangers by heeding the lessons of both. Andreyev thinks the solution lies in internationally enforceable safety standards and the establishment of a global nuclear disaster SWAT team for the inevitable disasters of the future. “Even an advanced country like Japan proved helpless,” he concluded. “They didn’t know what to do.”

In that light, Japan’s refusal to officially accept Ukraine’s nuclear disaster specialists does not bode well.

Soglie per la mutazione indotta dalle radiazioni?

  Articolo di revisione Soglie per la mutazione indotta dalle radiazioni? Il dibattito Muller-Evans: un punto di svolta per la valutazione d...