domenica 29 gennaio 2012

High-Level Cesium-134 in Nagasaki City


JANUARY 28, 2012


Now They Tell Us: Detection of High-Level Cesium-134 in Nagasaki City in April 2011http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2012/01/now-they-tell-us-detection-of-high.html

Toshihiro Takatsuji, associate professor at Nagasaki University announced the result of his measurement of radioactive cesium in the air at an international symposium, and said a high level of cesium-134 (13,000 becquerels/kg) was detected from the dust collected in the filter paper in early April last year in Nagasaki City, 1,000 kilometers away from Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant.



It took him 9 months to reveal what he had known in April last year. Not bad, I guess, considering there are many others who still hold back information that they obtained in March and April last year while they eagerly wait for the acceptance of their papers at international peer-review journals. Some information could have made a big difference in how people responded to the nuclear crisis if it had been revealed in a timely manner.

But maybe not in this case, as I cannot compare this number with any other number. How about the measurement of air filter papers in Fukushima or Tokyo during the same time period? How about the measurement in Nagasaki prior to the nuclear accident? What are we comparing this Nagasaki number to?

Chugoku Shinbun (1/26/2012):
福島第1原発から約千キロ離れた長崎市の大気観測所の吸引調査で、事故1カ月後に高い数値の放射性物質が確認されていたことが分かった。広島市南区の広島 大広仁会館で25日にあった同大原爆放射線医科学研究所(原医研)の国際シンポジウムで長崎大の高辻俊宏准教授が報告した。

It has been revealed that the suction survey at an atmospheric observatory in Nagasaki City, about 1000 kilomters from Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, showed a high level of radioactive materials one month after the nuclear accident. Toshihiro Takatsuji, associate professor at Nagasaki University reported at an international symposium by Hiroshima University Research Institute of Radiation Biology and Medicine (RIRBM) held on January 25 at Hiroshima University in Hiroshima City.

高辻准教授は事故後、1週間ごとに装置で吸引した空気や吸引口のろ紙の付着物のセシウムの量を調査。2011年3月23日から7月27日までの結果を報告した。

Professor Takatsuji measured the amount of radioactive cesium in the air captured by the air suction apparatus and on the filter paper at the suction entrance every week after the nuclear accident. He reported the results from March 23 to July 27, 2011.

4月6日からの週が特に高く、ろ紙に付着したちりなどのセシウム134の濃度は福島県飯舘村の土壌に相当する1キロ当たり1万1300ベクレルだった。

The week beginning on April 6 registered the highest level of radioactive cesium. The density of cesium-134 on the dust caught by the filter paper was 13,000 becquerels/kg, equivalent to the level seen in the soil in Iitate-mura in Fukushima Prefecture.

高辻准教授は米海洋大気局のデータから、4月6日は日本列島の南側を半円を描くように風が東北から九州に達していたと指摘。福島からの放射性物質と推測した。

Professor Takatsuji pointed out that on April 6, 2011, the wind reached from Tohoku to Kyushu (where Nagasaki is located) in an arc sweeping the Pacific side of Japan, according to the data from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). He deemed the radioactive cesium to be of Fukushima origin.

高辻准教授は「大気中の数値は低くても、空調機のフィルターなどには放射性物質が集積し高くなる可能性がある」と指摘した。  シンポジウムは26日もある。

The professor said, "Even if the amount in the atmosphere is low, it is possible that radioactive materials accumulate in the air filters." The symposium will continue on January 26.
13,000 becquerels/kg of cesium-134. No information about cesium-137, if it was detected at all in the air or on the filter paper.

I dispute the reference to Iitate-mura, though. From what I have read, the density of radioactive cesium in Iitate-mura's soil is much higher (50,000 becquerels/kg of radioactive cesium).

As an aside, Professor Takatsuji has been featured in a popular weekly Shukan Gendai magazine (as transcribed in this blog) in which, with Shinzo Kimura he assures the readers that the effect of radiation won't manifest in genes in the next generation, so the fear of expecting mothers in Fukushima is overblown.

But even the two admit that by continuing to live in the areas with elevated radiation levels the gene mutation which normally happens after 10 generations or more may happen within a few generation.

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Perché è così difficile riconoscere i danni da avvelenamento radioattivo sulla salute ? E da vaccini?

Risponde AI Perplexity:  Il riconoscimento degli effetti sulla salute dell'avvelenamento radiologico incontra notevoli ostacoli politici...