L’éternel débat sur les faibles doses

Il n'est de faibles doses que parce qu'il n'est que de faibles esprits.

http://www.aipri.blogspot.com/2012/01/il-nest-de-faibles-doses-parce-quil.html

L’éternel débat sur les faibles doses est un faux débat fondé sur les faux calculs physiques avancés par les faussaires de la science: la notion de "faible dose" est une fausse notion droit issue d'un calcul physique falsifié. Il est essentiel de savoir que le calcul de dose à travers lequel on mesure le dommageable dépôt, en particulier interne, d’une énergie ionisante dans un organisme est beaucoup plus simple qu’on ne le pense. C’est en effet une pure et simple division : Energie ionisante délivrée à chaque désintégration par le ou les éléments impliqués/Volume de chair qui la reçoit = Dose absorbée. Or et en tout cas pour la contamination interne par des émetteurs alpha (uranium 235, plutonium 239, etc.), il se trouve que le dénominateur de cette division (le volume de chair) est artificiellement grossi dans les calculs qui portent aux facteurs de dose afin d’amenuiser le résultat nominal. (Diviser 10 par 2 donne un dommage de 5, diviser 10 par 10 donne un dommage de 1…). Ce criminel artifice de calcul d’une déconcertante simplicité omet de prendre en compte le fait que le volume de chair effectivement irradiée dépend directement du pouvoir de pénétration bien évidemment limité du rayonnement dans la chair. Bref ces calculs omettent l’effet de proximité et tuent ceux-là mêmes qui les proposent… 

Unsuspecting Public Being Sacrificed

Fukushima – 350 Times Maximum Annual 

Radiation Dose Permissible?

9

Is an Unsuspecting Public Being Sacrificed?

350 Times the Maximum Annual Radiation Dose Permissible 40 mSv Hour Mainichi Daily News 20120121

    … by  Bob Nichols

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/08/350-times-maximum-annual-radiation-dose-permissible/

(San Francisco) A recent headline on the six crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Reactors read: “40 microSv/h detected from radioactive gravel site used for schools, homes — Measured one meter above source,” Jan 21, 2012.

I asked Physicist Dr. Paolo Scampa, PhD. of the AIPRI Blog fame, what this translates to for everyday people, their kids and families. The Fukushima nuclear tragedy is still going on after 335 days as of Wed, Feb 08, 2012 affecting the entire world.

US Imperial Unit Measurements

Dr. Scampa stated:

Public Warnings?

“An absorbed dose of 40 microSievert/hour at one Meter or about 39 inches above the ground, means a radioactive deposit creating an average of 12,330,000.00 Cesium 137 nuclear explosions per second (Becquerels) for every 39 inches square over much of the Northern Hemisphere.

Further, the radiation is spreading rapidly through the air. The Earth’s  surface is covered with many deadly radioactive isotopes from the six crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Reactors.”

 “This is 22 times more Radiation than the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) decreed for the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Disaster Exclusion Zone when they said everyone had to leave.

In Chernobyl the radioactivity level was 555,000.00 radioactive molecular nuclear explosions per second per 39 square inches.”

By contrast, delusional Japanese “public officials” declared deadly radioactive areas a simple Picnic and Recreation Grounds, thus sacrificing in place an unsuspecting public.

Dr Scampa concluded:

“This amount for a 39 square inch reading is, in fact, situated between a minimum deposit of 2.96 Million radioactive molecular nuclear explosions per 39 square inches of very energetic gamma rays from radioactive elements such as Cobalt 60 or  Rubidium 90 on the low side; and, the  maximum is a deposit of 74 Million radioactive molecular nuclear explosions per 39 square inches for low energy gamma rays from radioactive elements such as Uranium 238.

A single particle of this fuel stuck in the human body is about 350 times the Maximum Annual Radiation Dose Permissible.”

Metric Unit Measurements

Dr Scampa:

Why No Media Coverage?

“An absorbed dose of 40,0 microSieverts/hour at 1 meter above ground means an average deposit of 1,233E7 Bq/m2 of Cs137 (0,661 MeV.) This is 22 times greater than the IAEA Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Disaster Exclusion Zone value of 555,000 Bq/m2.

This amount for 1 meter above the ground is, in fact, situated between a maximum deposit of 7,400E7 Bq/m2 for low energy gamma rays from radioactive elements such as Uranium 238 (0,0495 MeV) and a minimum deposit of  2,960E6 Bq/m2 of very energetic gamma rays from radioactive elements such as Cobalt 60 (2,55 MeV) or Rubidium 90 (0,881 – 4,2 MeV).

A single particle of this fuel immobilised in the body corresponds to 350 times the Maximum Annual Radiation Dose Permissible.

By contrast, delusional Japanese “public officials” declared deadly radioactive areas just a simple Picnic and Recreation Ground; thus sacrificing in place an unsuspecting public.”

Ref.

Chris Busby, 2011, The health outcome of the Fukushima catastrophe. Initial analysis from risk model of the European Committee on Radiation Risk ECRR. http://canteach.candu.org/library/20041901.pdf

James T. (Tom) Voss, 2001, Los Alamos Radiation Monitoring Notebook.http://canteach.candu.org/library/20041901.pdf

Copyright 2012 by Bob Nichols. Re-print only with Notes and Sources included.

Sources and Notes

“Radiation of 40 microsieverts per hour detected at Namie quarry,” Feb 8, 2012,  The Mainichi Daily News,http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20120121p2a00m0na014000c.html

“40 microSv/h detected from radioactive gravel site used for schools, homes — Measured ONE METER above source,” Dr. Paolo Scampa, SATURDAY, JANUARY 21, 2012, AIPRI Blog, http://aipri.blogspot.com/2012/01/recreations-japonaises.html

“40 microSv/h detected from radioactive gravel site used for schools, homes — Measured one meter above source,” January 21st, 2012, By ENENEWS ADMIN. http://tinyurl.com/76hoq6u

Radioactive Isotopes mentioned above.
Cesium 137 (0.661 MeV)
Cobalt 60 (2.55 MeV)
Rubidium 90 (0.881 – 4.2 MeV)
Uranium 238 (4.95 MeV.)

Editing:  Jim W. Dean

Fukushima: dangers nowhere near resolved

Danger: This April 10 image released the next day by Tokyo Electric Power Co. shows the hydrogen blast-damaged reactor 4 building at the Fukushima No. 1 power plant. Inside, a spent fuel pool holds 1,500 nuclear fuel assemblies. TEPCO

Nuke dangers nowhere near resolved: Kan's crisis adviser

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120208f1.html

By REIJI YOSHIDA

Staff writer

In December, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda announced the "conclusion" of the meltdown crisis at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, saying Tokyo Electric Power Co. was managing to keep the three crippled reactors cool, as well as the facility's spent fuel pools.

Hiroshi Tasaka

But a former special adviser to Naoto Kan, who was prime minister when the crisis started, warned that the situation is far from resolved and said Fukushima has exposed a raft of serious nuclear problems that Japan will have to confront for years.

"I would say (the crisis) just opened Pandora's box," Hiroshi Tasaka, who has a doctorate in nuclear engineering and is now a professor at Tama University, said in a recent interview with The Japan Times.

January 31st, 2012 | Posted by Bob Nichols

Notice – Byron, Illinois Nuke In Trouble

40

Loss of Off-site Power Shuts Down Reactor

 … by Bob Nichols

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/31/notice-byron-illinois-nuke-in-trouble/

Jet Stream Winds push Radiation to Downtown Chicago

(San Francisco) Excelon Corporation announced Monday, Jan 30 that one of two reactors at Byron, Illinois had automatically shut down due to loss of electrical power from the electrical grid.

The two Byron nuclear stations generate almost 7 Billion Watts of heat, 2.3 Billion Watts is turned into electricity; the remaining 4.7 Billion Watts of Heat is wasted heating up the Rock River.

This is perfectly in line with the normal abysmal efficiency of the big nuke power reactors of at most 33%. Equivalent Billion Watt  coal and/or natural gas power plants hit 60% efficiency.

Light radioactive gases are being released in steam from the turbine building.

Excelon says this includes radioactive Hydrogen. Excelon’s description would be funny if it was not an outright lie and murderous in its application.

“The steam contains tritium, a hydrogen isotope with low levels of radioactivity. Exelon, in a news release, said tritium occurs naturally and is found in virtually all surface water, although it is found in greater concentrations near nuclear reactors.” …Excelon Corporation

Tritium is vanishingly rare in nature. Tritium is manufactured by atomic bombs and nuclear reactors. Tritium is then used by the nuclear weapons labs in hydrogen bombs to boost the bomb’s destructive output a thousand times.

A look inside the Bryon Control Room Created Sat Nov 19 2011

The simple fact of the matter is that radioactive hydrogen combines readily with water and all of us humans are 70% water.

What’s more, 80% of the molecular bonds in human bodies are hydrogen bonds. The radioactive hydrogen goes right through our clothes and skin to wreak havoc on a molecular scale.

Vets, Don’t Go to Byron, Il.

Because of this, I’d stay clear of the Byron, Illinois area for the immediate future. For VeteransToday readers, there is no good reason to go there.

All American nuclear reactors must be fed electricity from the electric grid from two separate directions. The outside electricity is used to power the all important water pumps. Without tons of moving water utter destruction is but hours away. It is a very interesting question, then from a military standpoint, of how both electrical feeds at the Byron Station were discontinued at the same time.

Your comments are welcome.

Sources and Notes.

“The steam contains Tritium,” Jan 31, 2012, Exelon on Byron, Il., “Byron Station Declares Unusual Event,” Byron News Release, Jan 30, 2012. http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/79874780?access_key=key-1ywmjgffakub40kpkaap

Unusual Event, State of Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs, Division of Emergency Management, Jan 30, 2012, Lon Getter. http://enenews.com/state-of-wisconsin-issues-statement-on-nuclear-incident-in-illinois-currently-monitoring-conditions-after-plant-lost-power-and-went-offline